Teams

Court Junkies

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - BOISE · TV

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesLynda Brown / Priscilla Routson vs Ellen Batt / Maureen Earl6-3, 6-2
2021-07-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesPriscilla Routson / Shay Warmack vs Stacey Novak / Valencia Bilyeu5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-24vs Spring ChicksWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Netz / Karen Sheehan vs Sue Markuson / Maria Garatea6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPriscilla Routson / Shay Warmack vs Michele Bowden / Patricia Estey6-1, 6-1
2021-06-12vs Slice GirlsWon 20
W#2 DoublesMary K Berg / Mary Hyde vs Ellen Batt / Rose Radke6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPriscilla Routson / Shay Warmack vs Linda Anthony / Patricia Hoffman6-2, 6-3
2021-06-10vs Side HustleLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Sheehan / Priscilla Routson vs Lora Bonser / Stacey Novak2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-05-25vs Pink FlamingosWon 20
W#2 DoublesPriscilla Routson / Shay Warmack vs Treva Pline / Debbie Smith7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Netz / Karen Sheehan vs Boz Kalange / Donna Strider6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Court Junkies6218614148
2Side Hustle5315925229
3Pink Flamingos2681634232
4Spring Chicks2681636260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Loria Sylvia
published 3.5
3.17
Dawn Lafrades
published 3.5
Shay Warmack
published 3
Karen Sheehan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Karyn Goodale-Durham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lynda Brown
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mary K Berg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Priscilla Routson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Lafrades + Shay Warmack9069% games+8.5% vs expected
Karyn Goodale-Durham + Shay Warmack161054% gamesnot enough data
Priscilla Routson + Shay Warmack10260% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Lafrades + Lynda Brown4462% gamesnot enough data
Karyn Goodale-Durham + Loria Sylvia6084% gamesnot enough data
Loria Sylvia + Lynda Brown404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Loria Sylvia
114W–31L career · no lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Dawn Lafrades
107W–80L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Shay Warmack
43W–18L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Sheehan
77W–84L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karyn Goodale-Durham
41W–55L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lynda Brown
58W–72L career · 12 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary K Berg
20W–36L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Priscilla Routson
51W–49L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.