Teams

Slice Girls

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - BOISE · TV

5 players · average NTRP 3.17 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Anthony / Patricia Hoffman vs Karyn Goodale-Durham / Loria Sylvia3-6, 2-6
2021-07-08vs Side HustleLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Anthony / Patricia Hoffman vs Stacey Kozakar / Cathy Drake6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-06-26vs Spring ChicksWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Anthony / Patricia Hoffman vs Karen Silva / Patricia Estey6-2, 6-1
2021-06-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Anthony / Patricia Hoffman vs Debbie Smith / Treva Pline6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2021-06-12vs Court JunkiesLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Anthony / Patricia Hoffman vs Priscilla Routson / Shay Warmack2-6, 3-6
2021-06-10vs Spring ChicksWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Cercle / Patricia Hoffman vs Dianne Wassall / Michele Bowden6-4, 6-1
2021-06-03vs Pink FlamingosWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatricia Hoffman / Ellen Batt vs Hollace Claiborn / Karen Weaver6-3, 6-4
2021-06-01vs Side HustleWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatricia Hoffman / Ellen Batt vs Valencia Bilyeu / Teresa Lyon6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Diane Cercle
published 3.5
2.93
Kathy Hansen
published 3
2.72
Rose Radke
published 3
Maureen Earl
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
Patricia Hoffman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Cercle + Maureen Earl23860% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Hansen + Diane Cercle2453% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Hoffman + Diane Cercle6061% gamesnot enough data
Rose Radke + Patricia Hoffman404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Cercle
129W–38L career · no lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
3
Kathy Hansen
66W–86L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Rose Radke
62W–108L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
Maureen Earl
64W–110L career · 12 lines in 2021
not enough data
Patricia Hoffman
114W–123L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.