← Search

Rose Radke

Boise, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 62W–108L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rose Radke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history170 matches
W
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Miranda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Miranda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Miranda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Hales mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-24 · Nothing But Love 55+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · Nothing But Love 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Markuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-01 · Nothing But Love 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Markuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-11 · Nothing But Love · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-06 · Nothing But Love · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Treva Pline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-04 · Nothing But Love · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-30 · Nice Hits · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-29 · Nothing But Love · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Clanton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 60.1% of games
3.0
30.6%
11W–25L · 39.8% of games
3.5
16.7%
4W–20L · 34.9% of games
6.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 48.1% of games
7.0
13.3%
2W–13L · 33.9% of games
6.0mixed
48.6%
18W–19L · 50.2% of games
6.5mixed
18.8%
3W–13L · 37.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
42 matches
#1 Singles
22%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
32 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer