Teams

WESS-Spence/Gagnuik 6.5W Weekend Combo F

2026 cSEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 65 COMBO SEM

7 players · average NTRP 3.20 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings33 teams · WOMEN 65 COMBO SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FAC-Melendy 6.5W Tues Day Combo F000000
2FAC-Meares 6.5W Tues Day Combo F000000
3CHIP-Lartigue 6.5W Tues Day Combo F000000
4BT-Demkowicz 6.5W Tues Day Combo F000000
5VTC-Johnston 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
6PEACH-Parrott 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
7PEACH-Hartel 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
8BRC-Novotny 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
9BRC-Scott 6.5 Weekend Combo F000000
10SCWB-Chen 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
11FAC-Vondell 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
12FAC-Meyers 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
13WESS-Reamer 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
14WESS-Smiley-Studier 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
15WESS-Spence/Gagnuik 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
16WESS-Brown 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
17LT-Marvel-Nelson 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
18BHC-Moore 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
19LT-Pulice 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
20HV-Cutler 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
21HV-King 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
22HV-Belcher 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
23PH-Douglas 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
24LIB-Inoue 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
25LIB-Marley 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
26FAC-Johnson 6.5 Weekend Combo F000000
27TROY-Segerlind 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
28EAST-Szabo 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
29EAST-Chigumba 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
30EAST-Zampardo 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
31MONY-Beres 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
32MONY-Loselle 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
33SCWB- Du 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Leah Crafard
published 3.5
3.33
Sara Van Wormer
published 3.5
2.96
Vicki Lee
published
2.91
Kristin Gagniuk
published 3
2.88
Lina E Bata
published 3
2.75
Meg Spence
published
2.43
Erin Durren
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lina E Bata + Leah Crafard10269% games+10.6% vs expected
Meg Spence + Erin Durren1442% games+1.9% vs expected
Vicki Lee + Kristin Gagniuk6077% gamesnot enough data
Vicki Lee + Meg Spence303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Leah Crafard
57W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Sara Van Wormer
102W–67L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Vicki Lee
25W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Kristin Gagniuk
27W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Lina E Bata
54W–40L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
2.88
Meg Spence
24W–33L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Erin Durren
29W–37L career · no lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.