Teams

VTC-Johnston 6.5W Weekend Combo F

2026 cSEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 65 COMBO SEM

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings33 teams · WOMEN 65 COMBO SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FAC-Melendy 6.5W Tues Day Combo F000000
2FAC-Meares 6.5W Tues Day Combo F000000
3CHIP-Lartigue 6.5W Tues Day Combo F000000
4BT-Demkowicz 6.5W Tues Day Combo F000000
5VTC-Johnston 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
6PEACH-Parrott 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
7PEACH-Hartel 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
8BRC-Novotny 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
9BRC-Scott 6.5 Weekend Combo F000000
10SCWB-Chen 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
11FAC-Vondell 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
12FAC-Meyers 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
13WESS-Reamer 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
14WESS-Smiley-Studier 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
15WESS-Spence/Gagnuik 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
16WESS-Brown 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
17LT-Marvel-Nelson 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
18BHC-Moore 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
19LT-Pulice 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
20HV-Cutler 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
21HV-King 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
22HV-Belcher 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
23PH-Douglas 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
24LIB-Inoue 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
25LIB-Marley 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
26FAC-Johnson 6.5 Weekend Combo F000000
27TROY-Segerlind 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
28EAST-Szabo 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
29EAST-Chigumba 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
30EAST-Zampardo 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
31MONY-Beres 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
32MONY-Loselle 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000
33SCWB- Du 6.5W Weekend Combo F000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Tammy Watson
published
3.42
Jeeyeon Kim
published
3.30
Kamilah Kelsaw
published 3.5
3.28
Marci Walker
published
3.06
Kristina Rossi
published 3
3.02
Ursula Jakob
published 3.5
3.02
Lilia Cortina
published 3.5
3.02
Marilyn Woolfolk
published 3.5
3.01
Emma Hurston-gates
published
2.69
Sonalee Shah
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marci Walker + Marilyn Woolfolk4261% games+10.2% vs expected
Kamilah Kelsaw + Lilia Cortina71345% games−2.3% vs expected
Ursula Jakob + Kamilah Kelsaw213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Watson
144W–108L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Jeeyeon Kim
9W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Kamilah Kelsaw
87W–100L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Marci Walker
116W–98L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3
Kristina Rossi
30W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.06
3.5
Ursula Jakob
101W–96L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Lilia Cortina
91W–107L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Marilyn Woolfolk
53W–94L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Emma Hurston-gates
15W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Sonalee Shah
22W–13L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.