Teams

CTC-Schulz

2022 OH OV Mixed 18&O Charleston · 2022 MXD 18&O 8.0 Charleston

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-28vs Teays Valley-PrinceSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelisa Greene / Ryon Zent vs Jason Prince / Melinda White1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesShannon Elliot / Mark Spriggs vs Paige Gracin / Michael Phillips7-6, 7-5
2022-08-21vs Teays Valley-PrinceSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRyon Zent / Melisa Greene vs RICK PRINCE / Paige Phillips6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAllison Ballard / Michael McClellan vs Michael Phillips / Paige Gracin3-6, 4-6
2022-08-11vs Teays Valley-PrinceLost 03
L#1 DoublesJason Waybright / Allison Ballard vs RICK PRINCE / Sydney Prince2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMark Spriggs / Shannon Elliot vs Scott Graham / Lauren Graham6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Nelson / Catherine Jarvis vs Jason Prince / Melinda White7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-07-21vs Teays Valley-PrinceLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Nelson / Mark Spriggs vs Scott Graham / Lauren Graham4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesShannon Elliot / David Nelson vs Jason Prince / Melinda White0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Ballard / Jason Waybright vs RICK PRINCE / Paige Phillips6-4, 6-2
2022-06-14vs Teays Valley-PrinceLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoshua Gross / Catherine Jarvis vs Michael Phillips / Paige Gracin5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 MXD 18&O 8.0 Charleston have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Catherine Jarvis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.69
Melisa Greene
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Allison Ballard
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jason Waybright
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Joshua Gross
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Spriggs
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Michael McClellan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ryon Zent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Elliot
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Spriggs + Allison Ballard5064% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Catherine Jarvis
41W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melisa Greene
41W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Allison Ballard
77W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Jason Waybright
33W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joshua Gross
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Mark Spriggs
33W–10L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael McClellan
48W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ryon Zent
15W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shannon Elliot
45W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.