Teams

Teays Valley-Prince

2022 OH OV Mixed 18&O Charleston · 2022 MXD 18&O 8.0 Charleston

8 players · average NTRP / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-28vs CTC-SchulzWon 21
W#1 DoublesJason Prince / Melinda White vs Melisa Greene / Ryon Zent6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPaige Gracin / Michael Phillips vs Shannon Elliot / Mark Spriggs6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRICK PRINCE / Sydney Prince vs Kimberly Nelson / David Nelson6-4, 6-3
2022-08-21vs CTC-SchulzSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRICK PRINCE / Paige Phillips vs Ryon Zent / Melisa Greene4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Phillips / Paige Gracin vs Allison Ballard / Michael McClellan6-3, 6-4
2022-08-11vs CTC-SchulzWon 20
W#1 DoublesRICK PRINCE / Sydney Prince vs Jason Waybright / Allison Ballard6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJason Prince / Melinda White vs David Nelson / Catherine Jarvis6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-21vs CTC-SchulzSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJason Prince / Melinda White vs Shannon Elliot / David Nelson6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRICK PRINCE / Paige Phillips vs Allison Ballard / Jason Waybright4-6, 2-6
2022-06-14vs CTC-SchulzSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Phillips / Paige Gracin vs Joshua Gross / Catherine Jarvis7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRICK PRINCE / Sydney Prince vs Kimberly Nelson / David Nelson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 MXD 18&O 8.0 Charleston have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Paige Gracin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Sydney Prince
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Whitney Hess
published
3.21
RICK PRINCE
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Jason Prince
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Melinda White
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Paige Phillips
published
Scott Graham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sydney Prince + RICK PRINCE5155% gamesnot enough data
Melinda White + RICK PRINCE044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paige Gracin
19W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
Sydney Prince
52W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.84
Whitney Hess
64W–41L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
RICK PRINCE
42W–70L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Jason Prince
23W–4L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melinda White
32W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paige Phillips
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Graham
21W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.