Teams

WNCT Walker (Aston Park)

Combo 55 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 55's Women 7.5 Combo - Sat

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-18vs WNCJ Kersey (Peachtree)Won 20
W#1 DoublesTracey Walker / Susan Sparboe-Derry vs Jennifer Kersey / Susan Fitzmaurice6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Hetherington / Susan Cook vs Christine Allan / Ronda Champion6-1, 7-6
2025-09-13vs WNCJ Kersey (Peachtree)Won 20
W#1 DoublesAnnie Lundahl / Susan Sparboe-Derry vs Mary Livesay / Melissa Coles6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Ann Wendel / Susan Watson vs Susan Lipski / Lisa Mathis6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55's Women 7.5 Combo - Sat have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Susan Sparboe-Derry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Sherrie Voyles
published
Amy Gaston
published 4
3.59
Tracey Walker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Mary Ann Wendel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Sarah Corley
published
3.47
Kelly Hetherington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Susan Chase
published
3.34
Scott Abernethy
published
3.29
Elaine Dephouse
published 3.5
Alex Diez
published 3.5
Annie Lundahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Etheridge
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Corley + Tracey Walker2347% games+1.6% vs expected
Sarah Corley + Sherrie Voyles224 matchesnot enough data
Tracey Walker + Sherrie Voyles224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ann Wendel + Kelly Hetherington134 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Corley + Amy Gaston123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Sparboe-Derry
19W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
Sherrie Voyles
36W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Amy Gaston
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracey Walker
26W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Mary Ann Wendel
15W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Sarah Corley
11W–27L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
Kelly Hetherington
11W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Susan Chase
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
Scott Abernethy
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Elaine Dephouse
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Alex Diez
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Annie Lundahl
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Etheridge
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.