Teams

Hot Shotz

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · Women 3.5 - 18 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.36 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-24vs Montana/Taylor/18&Over3.5WLost 05
L#1 DoublesEmily Ridgway / Faye Nelson vs Tina Ovnic / Mary Wagner6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Berghold vs Cassie Springer6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusie Boyer / Lauren Cromer vs Laura Toepfer / Kay Potter1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMelanie Maganias vs Diane Charlton3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMalissa Peace / Diane Buss vs Suzanne Taylor / DIANA RAIMONDO0-6, 3-6
2023-06-23vs Montana/Taylor/18&Over3.5WSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMalissa Peace / Amy Berghold vs Cassie Springer / Annelise Torgerson4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesFaye Nelson vs Katie Muenzberg6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMelanie Maganias vs Diane Charlton6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSusie Boyer / Diane Buss vs Tina Ovnic / Kay Potter3-6, 3-6
2023-06-23vs Montana/Taylor/18&Over3.5WLost 14
L#1 DoublesMelanie Maganias / Malissa Peace vs Laura Toepfer / Annelise Torgerson2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAmy Berghold vs Katie Muenzberg6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusie Boyer / Lauren Cromer vs Mary Wagner / DIANA RAIMONDO2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesFaye Nelson vs Cassie Springer3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Ridgway / Diane Buss vs Diane Charlton / Kay Potter2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5 - 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Taylor/18&Over3.5W301239106
2Hot Shotz0331224155

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Sarah Stilwill
published
3.23
Faye Nelson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Amy Berghold
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Emily Ridgway
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Rosanna Watson
published 3.5
3.15
Susie Boyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Lauren Cromer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Diane Buss
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Malissa Peace
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Melanie Maganias
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Faye Nelson + Emily Ridgway3351% games+9.0% vs expected
Amy Berghold + Faye Nelson3250% games+0.9% vs expected
Susie Boyer + Amy Berghold5450% games−1.7% vs expected
Susie Boyer + Lauren Cromer51638% games−1.8% vs expected
Susie Boyer + Faye Nelson4548% games−2.6% vs expected
Diane Buss + Lauren Cromer1730% games−13.8% vs expected
Faye Nelson + Rosanna Watson1447% gamesnot enough data
Diane Buss + Amy Berghold044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Stilwill
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Faye Nelson
21W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Amy Berghold
31W–32L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Emily Ridgway
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Rosanna Watson
5W–15L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Susie Boyer
32W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Lauren Cromer
8W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Diane Buss
13W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
Malissa Peace
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melanie Maganias
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.