Teams

No Mercy 2.0

2024 18&Over Men · 4.5

20 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-25vs We Hit DifferentWon 10
W#1 DoublesJunji Miyake / Pablo Gutarra vs Francisco Kim / Kirk Tsahalis6-2, 6-3
2024-07-12vs KaplanSplit 11
L#1 SinglesPablo Gutarra vs Tomer Mendler1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJunji Miyake / Philippe Gerschel vs Joseph Graziano / Jason Palleschi6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-27vs We Hit DifferentWon 10
W#3 DoublesPablo Gutarra / Emmanuel Sobong vs Kirk Tsahalis / Enrique Baez6-2, 7-6
2024-06-06vs We Hit DifferentWon 10
W#1 SinglesPablo Gutarra vs Amit DCruz6-4, 6-2
2024-05-30vs No ShenanigansLost 01
L#3 DoublesJACOB PEREZ / Junji Miyake vs Brandon Liebeskind / Morhaf Mahrous3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-23vs KaplanLost 01
L#2 DoublesVladi Tsipenyuk / Christopher Prevost vs Brian Leary / David Schwartz4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Eastern/Kaplan/18&Over4.5M7131926319
2No Mercy 2.054271842359
3We Hit Different27133270477

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
David Berenbaum
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 4.5
4.40
Vladi Tsipenyuk
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
4.36
Fabrizio Rotati
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.30
JACOB PEREZ
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
4.28
Chris Soulios
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
Christopher Prevost
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Shihas Vamanjoor
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
4.23
Philippe Gerschel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.23
Carlos Vasquez Sr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Pablo Gutarra
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published
4.21
Rudy Suresh
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.20
Emmanuel Sobong
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.17
Vladimir Koch
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.13
Sergey Shkop
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
4.10
Gabriel Topor
published
4.05
Craig Sandler
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
Francis Verpoucke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Junji Miyake
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Martin Payongayong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stefan Putyera
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JACOB PEREZ + Carlos Vasquez Sr9065% games+13.2% vs expected
Philippe Gerschel + Fabrizio Rotati6159% games+9.8% vs expected
Christopher Prevost + Stefan Putyera4153% games+6.2% vs expected
Sergey Shkop + Vladimir Koch5154% games+4.0% vs expected
David Berenbaum + Shihas Vamanjoor5257% games+2.8% vs expected
Philippe Gerschel + Craig Sandler6256% games+2.4% vs expected
Vladimir Koch + Fabrizio Rotati3648% games+0.0% vs expected
Vladimir Koch + Vladi Tsipenyuk6649% games−1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Berenbaum
33W–14L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
4.46
Vladi Tsipenyuk
82W–33L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
4.40
Fabrizio Rotati
40W–23L career · 8 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.36
JACOB PEREZ
74W–53L career · 11 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Chris Soulios
42W–27L career · 10 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Christopher Prevost
15W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Shihas Vamanjoor
38W–25L career · 10 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.25
Philippe Gerschel
46W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Carlos Vasquez Sr
110W–87L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Pablo Gutarra
31W–14L career · 9 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
Rudy Suresh
51W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
Emmanuel Sobong
75W–53L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
4.20
Vladimir Koch
46W–33L career · 6 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
Sergey Shkop
32W–22L career · 7 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.13
Gabriel Topor
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Craig Sandler
33W–38L career · 7 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.05
Francis Verpoucke
24W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Junji Miyake
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Martin Payongayong
10W–6L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stefan Putyera
19W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.