Teams

Eastern/Kaplan/18&Over4.5M

2024 18&Over Men · 4.5

24 players · average NTRP 4.58 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesEric Bochner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-18vs We Hit DifferentWon 10
W#1 DoublesAllan Orchard / Jon Rubinstein vs Kirk Tsahalis / Ben Kelly6-2, 6-2
2024-07-15vs No ShenanigansLost 01
L#1 SinglesEric Bochner vs Jacob Kaminsky6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-12vs PEM: Get A GripWon 10
W#3 DoublesScott Lowder / Eric Bochner vs Shihas Vamanjoor / David Berenbaum6-3, 6-4
2024-07-01vs PEM: Get A GripLost 01
L#1 SinglesEric Bochner vs Emmanuel Sobong2-6, 6-7
2024-06-24vs KaplanWon 10
W#1 SinglesEric Bochner vs Casey Schnabel6-4, 6-4
2024-06-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesCasey Schnabel / Eric Bochner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-10vs PEM: Get A GripLost 01
L#1 SinglesEric Bochner vs Fabrizio Rotati5-7, 5-7
2024-06-03vs KaplanWon 10
W#1 SinglesEric Bochner vs Harrison Abrams6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Eastern/Kaplan/18&Over4.5M7131926319
2No Mercy 2.054271842359
3We Hit Different27133270477

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Jason Palleschi
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
4.40
Sean Charnow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.39
Casey Schnabel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.38
David Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.36
David Mira
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.33
Harrison Abrams
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.33
Eric Bochner
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.33
Todd Green
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.26
Joseph Graziano
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Allan Orchard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Brian Leary
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.22
James Burger
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.21
Eric Ruta
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.15
Ray Kaplan
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.10
Jon Rubinstein
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.06
Peter Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.83
Andrew Song
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Gary Gulino
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Gregory Olesnycky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Jason Prezant
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Scott Gannon
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Scott Lowder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Todd Mekles
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tomer Mendler
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Bochner + Ray Kaplan6165% games+12.1% vs expected
David Schwartz + Todd Green6066% games+9.5% vs expected
Eric Ruta + Tomer Mendler5057% games+9.0% vs expected
Scott Lowder + Ray Kaplan5058% games+6.5% vs expected
Todd Mekles + James Burger6159% games+5.9% vs expected
Sean Charnow + Joseph Graziano11362% games+5.8% vs expected
Jon Rubinstein + Ray Kaplan9656% games+5.5% vs expected
Jason Palleschi + Joseph Graziano3258% games+4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Palleschi
86W–43L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
4.47
Sean Charnow
48W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
4.40
5
Casey Schnabel
78W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.39
4.5
David Schwartz
83W–26L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
4.38
4.5
David Mira
115W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
4.36
Harrison Abrams
49W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
4.33
Eric Bochner
44W–33L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
4.33
Todd Green
27W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
4.33
Joseph Graziano
51W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Allan Orchard
67W–31L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Brian Leary
14W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
James Burger
35W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
Eric Ruta
66W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
Ray Kaplan
48W–41L career · 8 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
4.15
Jon Rubinstein
163W–90L career · 8 lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
4.10
Peter Schmidt
13W–7L career · 7 lines in 2024
34%65%<1%
4.06
4.5
Andrew Song
24W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.83
Gary Gulino
39W–19L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gregory Olesnycky
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jason Prezant
7W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Gannon
8W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Lowder
22W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Todd Mekles
50W–33L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tomer Mendler
7W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.