Teams

V - LLW Malibu Beach Ballers C Kelly

2023 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over - WD · V - Women 3.5 WD

14 players · average NTRP 3.56 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-10-23vs V - Pierpont RiptidesLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatricia Palafox / Amanda Humphrey vs Michelle Duddy / Appolina Osborne3-6, 6-7
2023-10-11vs V - Sunset Bad Ace BeachesWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatricia Palafox / Michele Maher vs Tanya Thompson / Judy Eisenbrand6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2023-10-09vs V - Las Posas Love BitesLost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Wells / Patricia Palafox vs Amy Galan / Laura Kiker5-7, 6-7
2023-09-13vs V - North Ranch Wonder WomenLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlexandria Skouras / Laura Katzenberg vs Lisa Iezza / Sonia Bekian1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Palafox / Sarah Wells vs Kim Furniss / Brooke Roth0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Kelly Gores
published
April Geary
published 4
3.75
Samantha Cramer
published
3.70
Denise Sheffield
published 4
3.64
Stacey Vince
published
3.60
Amanda Humphrey
published 3.5
3.31
Rory Kennedy
published
3.28
Brenna Pierose
published 3.5
3.21
Laura Katzenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.19
Patricia Palafox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Alexandria Skouras
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Mica Belzberg
published 3.5
2.96
Kelly Stafford
published
Megan Whitcomb
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Humphrey + Rory Kennedy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Gores
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.81
4
April Geary
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Samantha Cramer
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Denise Sheffield
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Stacey Vince
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Amanda Humphrey
34W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.60
Rory Kennedy
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Brenna Pierose
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3
Laura Katzenberg
29W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%5%95%
3.21
3.5
Patricia Palafox
44W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Alexandria Skouras
11W–15L career · 4 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Mica Belzberg
1W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Kelly Stafford
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.96
Megan Whitcomb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.