Teams

EM RED

2023 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

5 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-09vs DTP YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSheryl Chandler / Tiffany Sandusky vs Skeeter Buck / Sarah Lessner6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKari Hale vs Meredith Giske6-2, 6-0
2023-08-03vs GCC NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesTiffany Sandusky / Kathy Klein vs Lori Marks-Connors / Merrell Aspin5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKari Hale vs Nicole Conroy6-1, 6-2
2023-07-26vs CHCC ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesTiffany Sandusky / Jill Wichlens vs Kelly Koch / Angela Lercara6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKari Hale vs Allison Stassen7-6, 6-4
2023-07-22vs GNO GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJill Wichlens / Kari Hale vs Meg Braun / Nancy Post2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTiffany Sandusky vs Lauren Hillary6-4, 6-3
2023-07-12vs PTC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesTiffany Sandusky / Jill Wichlens vs Dawn Larson / Caren Swan1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKari Hale vs Alyson Tittman6-2, 6-1
2023-06-28vs CACM PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Sandusky / Jill Wichlens vs Sarah Fitzgerald / Reba Tsvetkova3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Tiffany Sandusky
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.23
Kari Hale
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.90
Sheryl Chandler
published
2.68
Kathy Klein
published
2.53
Jill Wichlens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Wichlens + Tiffany Sandusky5154% gamesnot enough data
Jill Wichlens + Kari Hale2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tiffany Sandusky
92W–79L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Kari Hale
93W–63L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Sheryl Chandler
27W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
Kathy Klein
13W–24L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Jill Wichlens
62W–80L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.