Teams

GCC NAVY

2023 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-09vs PTC REDLost 02
L#1 SinglesShannon Elmore Bell vs Dawn Larson2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLori Marks-Connors / Katherine Crisham vs Elizabeth Stemper / Alyson Tittman6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-08-03vs EM REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Marks-Connors / Merrell Aspin vs Tiffany Sandusky / Kathy Klein5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-07-26vs CACM PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesMerrell Aspin / Maya Pingle Trinen vs Reba Tsvetkova / Kristine Strayer1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Lloyd / Katherine Crisham vs Sarah Fitzgerald / Victoria Anderson4-6, 0-6
2023-07-19vs DTP YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Marks-Connors / Maya Pingle Trinen vs Sarah Lessner / Meredith Giske6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Lloyd / Katherine Crisham vs Krissy Gilhooly / Shari Gordon6-1, 6-3
2023-07-06vs CHCC ORANGEWon 10
W#2 DoublesLori Marks-Connors / Shannon Elmore Bell vs Nanette Baumbusch / Bevin Wallace6-4, 7-6
2023-06-28vs GNO GREENLost 02
L#1 SinglesKatherine Crisham vs Leslie Moody2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMerrell Aspin / Maya Pingle Trinen vs Jill Hibbeln / Jennifer Delaney6-0, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Whitney Yoost
published
2.94
Katherine Crisham
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.73
Merrell Aspin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Shannon Elmore Bell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.70
Nicole Conroy
published
2.66
Maya Pingle Trinen
published
2.56
Lori Marks-Connors
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Sarah Schnittman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Marks-Connors + Merrell Aspin4450% gamesnot enough data
Lori Marks-Connors + Shannon Elmore Bell4154% gamesnot enough data
Lori Marks-Connors + Katherine Crisham134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Yoost
11W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Katherine Crisham
33W–21L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Merrell Aspin
78W–93L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Shannon Elmore Bell
88W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70
Nicole Conroy
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70
Maya Pingle Trinen
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Lori Marks-Connors
79W–84L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
2.56
Sarah Schnittman
7W–26L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.