Teams

LTFCS VOSS

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-12vs CSRC BREESEWon 10
W#1 DoublesJudy Flaherty / Rebecca Martin vs Diane Jackson / Chie Okubo6-3, 6-0
2021-07-05vs CSRC CARPENTERWon 20
W#1 DoublesJudy Flaherty / Karen Ross vs Jennifer Emerson / Kristen Lange6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSalome D'Silva / Cindy Yetter vs Patty Carpenter / Sandra Cook4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-06-28vs FLYHS LEVKUSSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJudy Flaherty vs Martina Levkus6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Ross / Salome D'Silva vs Elayna Rathmann / Lori Schmucker6-1, 6-0
2021-06-21vs CSRC BREESEWon 10
W#3 DoublesSalome D'Silva / Jennifer Madden vs Vikki ONeil / Diana Garcia-Poore6-3, 6-3
2021-06-14vs CSRC CARPENTERWon 20
W#1 SinglesJudy Flaherty vs Candace McCollett6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSalome D'Silva / Cindy Yetter vs Patty Carpenter / Sandra Cook6-4, 6-3
2021-06-07vs FLYHS LEVKUSWon 10
W#2 DoublesCindy Yetter / Salome D'Silva vs Kristi Creps / Jamie Roach4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Judy Flaherty
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Rebecca Martin
published
3.84
Karen Ross
published
Cindy Yetter
published 4
3.56
Salome D'Silva
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.50
Tina Watson
published
Joan Nachbar
published
Shinobu Voss
published
Susan Hilton
published
Tonya Duval
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Ross + Judy Flaherty4357% games+8.2% vs expected
Cindy Yetter + Susan Hilton23959% games+4.4% vs expected
Cindy Yetter + Salome D'Silva6649% games−6.5% vs expected
Tonya Duval + Tina Watson1547% gamesnot enough data
Judy Flaherty + Rebecca Martin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Judy Flaherty
79W–68L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
4.21
Rebecca Martin
37W–50L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
4.12
Karen Ross
54W–42L career · no lines in 2021
89%11%<1%
3.84
4
Cindy Yetter
35W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Salome D'Silva
78W–68L career · 5 lines in 2021
32%67%<1%
3.56
Tina Watson
8W–17L career · no lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.50
Joan Nachbar
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shinobu Voss
55W–32L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Hilton
30W–23L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tonya Duval
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.