Teams

CSRC BREESE

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-12vs LTFCS VOSSLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Laird / Kady Hommel vs Karen Ross / Tonya Duval6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2021-07-05vs FLYHS LEVKUSLost 02
L#1 DoublesTrista Niemann / Sara Breese vs Maggie Wilson / Leslie Jaworowski4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKady Hommel / Amy Laird vs Martina Levkus / Kristi Creps4-6, 4-6
2021-06-28vs CSRC CARPENTERSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAmy Laird / Jennifer Kapitan vs Patty Carpenter / Sandra Cook3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSara Breese / Diana Garcia-Poore vs Stephanie Brock / Caron Dumler6-3, 6-2
2021-06-21vs LTFCS VOSSLost 01
L#2 DoublesKady Hommel / Sara Breese vs Rebecca Martin / Cindy Yetter6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-06-14vs FLYHS LEVKUSWon 20
W#1 DoublesSara Breese / Trista Niemann vs Jamie Roach / Kristi Creps6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Laird / Diane Jackson vs Leslie Jaworowski / Maggie Wilson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-07vs CSRC CARPENTERLost 01
L#2 DoublesKady Hommel / Amy Laird vs Patty Carpenter / Sandra Cook4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Laird
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
Kady Hommel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Sara Breese
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.51
3.51
Chie Okubo
published 4
3.29
Vincenta van Every
published
Jennifer Kapitan
published
Vikki ONeil
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Garcia-Poore + Sara Breese2848% games+2.2% vs expected
Chie Okubo + Jennifer Kapitan2353% games+1.8% vs expected
Amy Laird + Kady Hommel8849% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Laird
38W–55L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Kady Hommel
102W–88L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Sara Breese
96W–84L career · 4 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Diana Garcia-Poore
21W–38L career · no lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Chie Okubo
26W–23L career · no lines in 2021
47%53%<1%
3.51
Vincenta van Every
41W–39L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
Jennifer Kapitan
43W–38L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vikki ONeil
21W–38L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.