Teams

CLAREMONT R and S 18AW3.0A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Rachel Been
published
3.31
Kye Heinstein
published
Alexis Ramenofsky
published 3.5
3.20
Christina Wiellette
published 3.5
3.14
Susan Kung
published
3.08
Janicke Polumbo
published
3.02
Rebecca Erickson
published
3.01
Kirsten Lang
published
3.00
Karin Hein
published
2.92
Cortney Allen
published 3
2.82
Molly Kennedy
published
2.82
Jackie Vincent
published
2.73
Cynthia Reiss
published 3
2.72
Annette Clear
published 3
2.69
Sophie McNeil
published
2.63
Carolyn Whittle
published 3
2.61
Susie Poncelet
published
2.54
Cindy Reid
published 3
Inocencia Jayaratne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Kung + Christina Wiellette134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Been
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
Kye Heinstein
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Alexis Ramenofsky
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Christina Wiellette
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Susan Kung
7W–18L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Janicke Polumbo
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Rebecca Erickson
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
Kirsten Lang
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Karin Hein
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Cortney Allen
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
2.92
Molly Kennedy
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Jackie Vincent
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Cynthia Reiss
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Annette Clear
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
Sophie McNeil
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Carolyn Whittle
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
Susie Poncelet
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Cindy Reid
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54
Inocencia Jayaratne
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.