Teams

OB - Keel

2026 GS USTA Tri-Level 18 & Over League · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-01vs OB - WheelerLost 02
L#1 DoublesFarrah Keel / Jill Middleton vs Parrish Walker / Cheslie Larkin0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJamie Wood / Amanda Hancock vs Stephanie Boll / Jessica Lazzarino0-6, 2-6
2026-05-19vs OB - WheelerLost 02
L#1 DoublesFarrah Keel / Nicole Miller vs Alecia Harrell / AnnaLee Wyse2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEnsley Keel / Amanda Williamson vs Amber Eddins / Slavina Dimova0-6, 1-6
2026-05-14vs OB - WheelerLost 12
L#1 DoublesFarrah Keel / Jill Middleton vs Ashley Wheeler / Cheslie Larkin4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTatum Keel / Amanda Hancock vs AnnaLee Wyse / Brandy Lewis4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJamie Wood / Lisa Littrell vs Kathy Farrow / Lucy Wheeler6-3, 6-4
2026-05-05vs OB - WheelerLost 12
L#1 DoublesFarrah Keel / Nicole Miller vs Jessica Lazzarino / Alecia Harrell6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmanda Hancock / Jennifer Peterson vs Brandy Lewis / Marcy Costa6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Littrell / Ensley Keel vs Kathy Farrow / Lucy Wheeler5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OB - Wheeler50132668
2OB - Keel0521326163

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Kimberly Barton
published
3.49
Jill Middleton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Amanda Hancock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Farrah Keel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Jamie Wood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Leanne Collins
published
2.71
Tatum Keel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Amanda Williamson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Lisa Littrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ensley Keel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leona Lenaz
published
Nicole Miller
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Barton
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
Jill Middleton
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
3.5
Amanda Hancock
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Farrah Keel
5W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Jamie Wood
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Leanne Collins
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.90
Tatum Keel
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Amanda Williamson
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Lisa Littrell
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
Ensley Keel
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leona Lenaz
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nicole Miller
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.