Teams

OB - Wheeler

2026 GS USTA Tri-Level 18 & Over League · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-01vs OB - KeelWon 20
W#1 DoublesParrish Walker / Cheslie Larkin vs Farrah Keel / Jill Middleton6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Boll / Jessica Lazzarino vs Jamie Wood / Amanda Hancock6-0, 6-2
2026-05-19vs OB - KeelWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlecia Harrell / AnnaLee Wyse vs Farrah Keel / Nicole Miller6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmber Eddins / Slavina Dimova vs Ensley Keel / Amanda Williamson6-0, 6-1
2026-05-14vs OB - KeelWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshley Wheeler / Cheslie Larkin vs Farrah Keel / Jill Middleton6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnnaLee Wyse / Brandy Lewis vs Tatum Keel / Amanda Hancock6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathy Farrow / Lucy Wheeler vs Jamie Wood / Lisa Littrell3-6, 4-6
2026-05-05vs OB - KeelWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Lazzarino / Alecia Harrell vs Farrah Keel / Nicole Miller2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrandy Lewis / Marcy Costa vs Amanda Hancock / Jennifer Peterson1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Farrow / Lucy Wheeler vs Lisa Littrell / Ensley Keel7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OB - Wheeler50132668
2OB - Keel0521326163

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Parrish Walker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Cheslie Larkin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Alecia Harrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
AnnaLee Wyse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.49
Ashley Wheeler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Stephanie Boll
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Jessica Lazzarino
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.12
Amber Eddins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.11
Brandy Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Kathy Farrow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Marcy Costa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Lucy Wheeler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Slavina Dimova
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Boll + Jessica Lazzarino4357% games+20.2% vs expected
Ashley Wheeler + Jessica Lazzarino7163% games+18.3% vs expected
AnnaLee Wyse + Ashley Wheeler3350% games+0.5% vs expected
Cheslie Larkin + Alecia Harrell0539% games−7.7% vs expected
Alecia Harrell + Jessica Lazzarino2344% gamesnot enough data
Cheslie Larkin + Ashley Wheeler224 matchesnot enough data
Amber Eddins + Stephanie Boll404 matchesnot enough data
AnnaLee Wyse + Alecia Harrell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parrish Walker
43W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.82
4
Cheslie Larkin
13W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Alecia Harrell
62W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
AnnaLee Wyse
49W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Ashley Wheeler
49W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
Stephanie Boll
46W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.32
Jessica Lazzarino
31W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
3
Amber Eddins
23W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
3.5
Brandy Lewis
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Kathy Farrow
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Marcy Costa
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Lucy Wheeler
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
Slavina Dimova
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.