Teams

Sumrall 3.5

2026 Mixed 18&Over-PB · 3.5 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-18vs Meridian CTAWon 20
W#1 DoublesJames Sumrall / Brooke Stuart vs Michael Hodge / Nicola Fruge6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Long / Beth Rodgers vs Julious Heidelberg / Andrea Skelton6-1, 6-2
2026-07-12vs Meridian CTAWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrian Long / Kayla Rainey vs D'Quante Evans / Andrea Skelton6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWill Godfrey / Allison Radley vs Joey Williams / Nicola Fruge6-1, 6-3
2026-07-09vs Meridian CTAWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Sumrall / Brooke Stuart vs D'Quante Evans / Semmes Ford6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJon Goldman / Kayla Rainey vs Julious Heidelberg / Andrea Skelton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChad Carmichael / Kaitlyn Oswalt vs Chance Davidson / Katherine Swafford6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Barbara Holcomb
published 3.5
3.34
Beth Rodgers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Chad Carmichael
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Allison Radley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Brooke Stuart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Kaitlyn Oswalt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Trinity Henn
published
3.12
James Sumrall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Will Godfrey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Jon Goldman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Patrick Dauphin
published
2.77
Kayla Rainey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Dauphin + Barbara Holcomb303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Barbara Holcomb
57W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Beth Rodgers
29W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Chad Carmichael
17W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Allison Radley
23W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Brooke Stuart
32W–6L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Kaitlyn Oswalt
15W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Trinity Henn
11W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
James Sumrall
23W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.12
Will Godfrey
12W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.10
Jon Goldman
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.97
Patrick Dauphin
17W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.97
Kayla Rainey
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.