← Teams

WHRC-Leong

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.71 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Kayleen Mendenhall
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.77
Shannon Roarke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Mary Lowblad
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Heike Droste
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Suzanne Chambers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Tina Prassas
published 3.5
3.15
Kathy Cook
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Results12 ties
2021-08-28Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesKate Leatherbarrow / Mary Lowblad vs Jolene Boughton / Kristi Thomsen6-2, 6-2
2021-08-27Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesMary Lowblad / Kate Leatherbarrow vs Mauntrece Zamzow / Victoria Stanton6-2, 6-2
2021-08-01Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesMary Lowblad / Hong Huynh vs Rico McIver / Nancy Williams6-2, 6-3
2021-07-31Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesHong Huynh / Mary Lowblad vs KEELEY PLOMBON / Joy Meyers7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2021-07-17Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesHong Huynh / Shannon Roarke vs Jin Velasco / Kaie Wellman7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Chambers vs May Graham6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKate Leatherbarrow / Mary Lowblad vs Erin Casey / Miriam Habafy4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeike Droste / Tina Prassas vs Dar Dragoon / Michelle Johnson6-3, 7-5
2021-07-11Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMary Lowblad / Bill Lowblad vs Andrea Vicino / John Yu6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-10Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKayleen Mendenhall / Shannon Roarke vs Sara Swanborn / Hong Allen6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKathy Cook vs Joy Kolesnikoff6-3, 6-2
2021-07-10Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesBill Lowblad / Mary Lowblad vs Andy LaFrazia / Cheryl Hopkins7-5, 6-2
2021-07-09Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKayleen Mendenhall / Hong Huynh vs Kim Hasle / Terri Gotcher6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Chambers vs Carolyn Bachhuber6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Lowblad / Kate Leatherbarrow vs Alison Davis / Mary Murphy6-3, 6-2
2021-07-03Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKayleen Mendenhall / Shannon Roarke vs Erin Hill / Michele Snyder6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHong Huynh / Suzanne Chambers vs Jennifer Lucas / Julie Trujillo6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMary Lowblad / Kate Leatherbarrow vs Jennifer Woodard / Janice Ackley6-1, 6-0
2021-06-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKayleen Mendenhall / Shannon Roarke vs Cheri Martes Davis / Vivian Nguyen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKathy Cook vs Mary Green-Zwemke7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHong Huynh / Suzanne Chambers vs Sandi Martes / Tonya Halog6-4, 6-1
2021-06-06Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesHong Huynh / Shannon Roarke vs Dana Baioni / Michelle Posey6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKathy Cook vs Vickie Maletteri6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeike Droste / Tina Prassas vs Kathleen Cooney / Christine Brecht6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kayleen Mendenhall
95W–65L career
0%98%2%
3.84
4
Shannon Roarke
84W–20L career
1%99%1%
3.77
4
Mary Lowblad
123W–61L career
4%95%1%
3.73
3.5
Heike Droste
158W–91L career
0%89%11%
3.46
3.5
Suzanne Chambers
80W–68L career
0%98%2%
3.31
3.5
Tina Prassas
24W–8L career
1%97%2%
3.31
3.5
Kathy Cook
85W–36L career
8%92%0%
3.15

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.