Teams

SFV LLW - Wyld Holes - Neal Skuro

2024 Adult 18+ SFV Spring · SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.5

22 players · average NTRP 4.64 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-06-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesEric Gonda / Benjamin Stork vs Ryan Williams / David Castillo7-5, 6-3
2024-06-09vs SFV - Breakfast ClubWon 10
W#3 DoublesNeal Skuro / Eric Gonda vs Brandon Su / Joe Chan6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Daniel Sutman
published 5
4.56
EDWARD CHOI
published 5
4.55
Eugene Tran
published 5
4.53
Edgar Bove
published 5
4.52
Hirsch Matani
published 5
4.48
Steve Wilde
published
4.45
Shane Garrett
published
4.33
ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
published 4.5
4.33
Arthur Chen
published 4.5
4.30
Andy Olyphant
published 4.5
4.28
Jason Gorman
published
4.27
Colin Tang
published 4
Benjamin Stork
published 4.5
Gordon Tak Yin Hong
published 4.5
4.24
Ivan Salazar
published 4.5
4.20
Khoa Do
published
4.20
Eric Gonda
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
4.08
Adam Scott
published 4.5
Neal Skuro
published
Peter Gopaoco
published
Ronnak Saxena
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Daniel Sutman
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
5
EDWARD CHOI
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.56
5
Eugene Tran
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
4.55
5
Edgar Bove
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
4.53
5
Hirsch Matani
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
4.52
Steve Wilde
21W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
4.48
Shane Garrett
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Arthur Chen
19W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Andy Olyphant
4W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.30
Jason Gorman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.28
4
Colin Tang
17W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
4.27
4.5
Benjamin Stork
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Gordon Tak Yin Hong
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Ivan Salazar
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
4.24
Khoa Do
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Eric Gonda
66W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.20
Paul Vincent Salvador
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Adam Scott
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
Neal Skuro
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Gopaoco
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ronnak Saxena
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.