Teams

SoCal/Peters/18&Over5.0M

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Men - 5.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesEvan Han / Tim Crawmer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-10vs BC-AltaVista/TylerTulenkoWon 10
W#2 DoublesTim Crawmer / Hannes Schenk vs Tyler Tulenko / Carlos Cruz-Aedo6-4, 6-4
2025-05-03vs BC-ElSegundo/JarrodQuanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEvan Han / Simon Peters vs Daniel Keolasy / Hunter Kettering7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesZachary Hublitz vs Kyle Vo6-2, 6-0
2025-04-19vs BC-AltaVista/TylerTulenkoWon 21
W#1 DoublesKEISUKE ABIKO / Josh Hublitz vs Boris Bakalov / Casey Grindon6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesZachary Hublitz vs Ruben Alberts6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHannes Schenk / Tatsuya Ishizuka vs Jackson Frons / Christopher Dalton5-7, 3-6
2025-04-12vs BC-ElSegundo/JarrodQuanWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark de Castro / Kyle McCann vs Kyle Vo / Francesco Nguyen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJosh Hublitz / Zachary Hublitz vs Daniel Keolasy / Stefan Cutovic6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.54 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hannes Schenk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.70
KEISUKE ABIKO
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.62
Tim Crawmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.50
Tatsuya Ishizuka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.35
Simon Peters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Evan Han
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Josh Hublitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kyle McCann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark de Castro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Zachary Hublitz
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Hannes Schenk
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
KEISUKE ABIKO
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
4.70
4.5
Tim Crawmer
26W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
4.62
Tatsuya Ishizuka
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.50
Simon Peters
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Evan Han
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Josh Hublitz
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kyle McCann
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mark de Castro
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Zachary Hublitz
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.