Teams

BC-AltaVista/TylerTulenko

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Men - 5.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.86 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-14vs SoCal/Peters/18&Over5.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Dalton / Carlos Cruz-Aedo vs Matthew Poh / Simon Peters6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-17Won 10
W#1 SinglesCasey Grindon vs Kevin Wang6-1, 6-1
2025-05-10vs SoCal/Peters/18&Over5.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesTyler Tulenko / Carlos Cruz-Aedo vs Tim Crawmer / Hannes Schenk4-6, 4-6
2025-04-19vs SoCal/Peters/18&Over5.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesBoris Bakalov / Casey Grindon vs KEISUKE ABIKO / Josh Hublitz3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRuben Alberts vs Zachary Hublitz4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJackson Frons / Christopher Dalton vs Hannes Schenk / Tatsuya Ishizuka7-5, 6-3
2025-04-05vs BC-ElSegundo/JarrodQuanWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharlie Franks / Ruben Alberts vs Hunter Kettering / Michael Cheatham6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTyler Tulenko vs Stefan Cutovic6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAshton Politanoff / Casey Grindon vs Daniel Keolasy / Francesco Nguyen6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.50 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.91
Ruben Alberts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.82
Casey Grindon
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
Ashton Politanoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Boris Bakalov
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Charlie Franks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.46
Christopher Dalton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.24
Carlos Cruz-Aedo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.08
Christopher Rossi
published 4.5
Gordon Tak Yin Hong
published
Jackson Frons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tyler Tulenko
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ruben Alberts
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.91
5
Casey Grindon
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.82
5
Ashton Politanoff
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
5
Boris Bakalov
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
5
Charlie Franks
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
5
Christopher Dalton
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.46
4.5
Carlos Cruz-Aedo
78W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Christopher Rossi
2W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
Gordon Tak Yin Hong
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jackson Frons
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Tulenko
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.