Teams

HMTC SILVER

2023 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - NOCO · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-18vs FCCC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesNeil Coulter / Rebecca Tatman vs Neal McConnellogue / Kim McConnellogue6-3, 6-4
2023-06-12vs LVTA REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRebecca Tatman / Neil Coulter vs Austin Johnson / Edward Kendall6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJameel Chohan / Vicki Dean vs Valerie Hecker / Nick Wanke1-6, 4-6
2023-06-11vs CSU GOLDLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Tatman / Neil Coulter vs Aaron Phillips / Liz Cundall4-6, 0-6
2023-05-28vs FCCC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesRebecca Tatman / Neil Coulter vs Kelli Barber / Dean Barber2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Stout / Jim Draper vs Crystal Osthoff / Josh Shelby2-6, 3-6
2023-05-21vs CSU GOLDLost 02
L#1 DoublesNeil Coulter / Rebecca Tatman vs Liz Cundall / Joe Ashbee6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJameel Chohan / Vicki Dean vs Andrea Flake / Nicholas Diel6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Jameel Chohan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Rebecca Tatman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Alli Lackey
published 3.5
3.34
Kendal Sanders
published
3.31
Angela Brown
published 3.5
3.06
Crip Erickson
published 3.5
2.72
Tracy Sanders
published
2.40
Judy Stout
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jim Draper
published
Vicki Dean
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kendal Sanders + Tracy Sanders0531% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jameel Chohan
32W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Rebecca Tatman
47W–94L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Alli Lackey
57W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
Kendal Sanders
24W–35L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Angela Brown
10W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Crip Erickson
6W–26L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Tracy Sanders
10W–25L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Judy Stout
35W–126L career · 1 line in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.40
Jim Draper
1W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vicki Dean
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.