Teams

Court Crushers

2026 Corpus Christi 55 & Over USTA League · Ladies 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-24vs CCCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDonna Jackson / Mary Lupe Arana vs Stephanie Kenigsberg / Tracy Fraiche6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGinger Martin / Genevieve Hatton vs Loyce Woods / Patricia Aitken4-6, 5-7
2026-03-10vs Racq PacqWon 30
W#1 DoublesDonna Jackson / Susan Temple vs Jonna Davidson / Jane Huston6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGinger Martin / Nancy Barrera vs Stephanie Hastings / Elizabeth Loveland7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Burch / Theresa Swirenko vs Marsai Bass / Patsy Padron6-4, 6-4
2026-03-03vs CCCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Barrera / Susan Temple vs Cathy Winn / Laura Hunter6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Jackson / Mary Lupe Arana vs Tonya May / Patricia Aitken6-1, 6-2
2026-02-17vs Racq PacqWon 30
W#1 DoublesDonna Jackson / Susan Temple vs Jonna Davidson / Michelle Thompson7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNancy Barrera / Theresa Swirenko vs Stephanie Hastings / Anita Moore2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Burch / Kathy Samuels vs Marsai Bass / Jane Huston7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Ladies 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Court Crushers40111369
2CCCC0421020129

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Nancy Barrera
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Theresa Swirenko
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Carolyn Burch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Linda Griffin
published
3.76
Susan Temple
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Janet Knesek
published
3.64
Mary Lupe Arana
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Ginger Martin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Genevieve Hatton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Samuels
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Barrera
25W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
Theresa Swirenko
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Carolyn Burch
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
Linda Griffin
18W–17L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
Susan Temple
29W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
Janet Knesek
8W–3L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Mary Lupe Arana
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
Ginger Martin
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.46
Genevieve Hatton
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Samuels
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.