Teams

Racq Pacq

2026 Corpus Christi 55 & Over USTA League · Ladies 8.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-17vs CCCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJonna Davidson / Stephanie Hastings vs Tracey Barre / Tracy Fraiche6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPatsy Padron / Anita Moore vs Lynne Lassig / Tonya May6-2, 6-1
2026-03-10vs Court CrushersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJonna Davidson / Jane Huston vs Donna Jackson / Susan Temple3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Hastings / Elizabeth Loveland vs Ginger Martin / Nancy Barrera5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarsai Bass / Patsy Padron vs Carolyn Burch / Theresa Swirenko4-6, 4-6
2026-02-24vs CCCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnita Moore / Stephanie Hastings vs Loyce Woods / Stephanie Kenigsberg6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJonna Davidson / Michelle Thompson vs Cathy Winn / Laura Hunter6-0, 6-3
2026-02-17vs Court CrushersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJonna Davidson / Michelle Thompson vs Donna Jackson / Susan Temple6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Hastings / Anita Moore vs Nancy Barrera / Theresa Swirenko6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarsai Bass / Jane Huston vs Carolyn Burch / Kathy Samuels5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Stephanie Hastings
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Anita Moore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Jonna Davidson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Jane Huston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Patsy Padron
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Marsai Bass
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Elizabeth Loveland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Moore + Stephanie Hastings12559% games+3.4% vs expected
Marsai Bass + Jonna Davidson224 matchesnot enough data
Patsy Padron + Jane Huston224 matchesnot enough data
Marsai Bass + Patsy Padron033 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Hastings + Jonna Davidson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Hastings
35W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Anita Moore
27W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Jonna Davidson
27W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
Jane Huston
36W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.59
Patsy Padron
27W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Marsai Bass
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.44
Elizabeth Loveland
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.