Teams

LTA-P PURPLE

2023 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.81 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-20vs NJ GREENLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesOlimpia Mejia / Britt Allen vs Mallory Karr / Natalia Isabel Camera Perez1-6, 3-6
2023-07-11vs NJ YELLOWLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesSara Fedorka / Hayley Hanes vs Jamie Pledger / Jene Pledger7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-27vs NJ BLUELost 01
L#1 Female DoublesOlimpia Mejia / Halonah Paiss vs Katherine Lazenby / Erica Moser4-6, 0-6
2023-06-20vs KC-RH REDSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesOlimpia Mejia / Carolyn Baker vs Kara Robbins / Jessica Cleary0-6, 3-6
W#1 Female SinglesSara Fedorka vs Abigail Gallant6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-13vs BP REDLost 02
L#1 Female SinglesSara Fedorka vs Cameron Passmore3-6, 2-6
L#2 Female SinglesKendra Seoane vs Macy Bauerle1-6, 0-6
2023-06-06vs NJ YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesCarolyn Baker / Sara Fedorka vs Caitlin Bock / Mary Virginia Simpson6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 Female SinglesKendra Seoane vs Gretchen Cork5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BP RED6113817169
2KC-RH RED34111021184
3LTA-P PURPLE2581330204

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Olimpia Mejia
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Laura Nagel
published
Allyson Horvath
published 4
Britt Allen
published 4
Hayley Hanes
published 4
3.59
Sara Fedorka
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 50% · published 4
3.35
Carolyn Baker
published 3.5
3.34
Kendra Seoane
usually #1 Female Singles 50%, also #2 Female Singles 50% · published 3.5
Halonah Paiss
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Olimpia Mejia + Sara Fedorka224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Olimpia Mejia
101W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.95
Laura Nagel
49W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Allyson Horvath
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Britt Allen
25W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Hayley Hanes
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Sara Fedorka
37W–66L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Carolyn Baker
30W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Kendra Seoane
28W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Halonah Paiss
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.