Teams

NJ BLUE

2023 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

6 players · average NTRP 4.20 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-18vs NJ GREENLost 03
L#1 Female DoublesKatherine Lazenby / Erica Moser vs Joy Herrin / Natalia Isabel Camera Perez2-6, 4-6
L#1 Female SinglesK Autumn Hartley vs Mary Brennan4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 Female SinglesBrittany Guidetti vs Erin Conley1-6, 3-6
2023-07-11vs BP REDSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesErica Moser / Alivia Lebeau vs Victoria Williams / Katherine Balfany6-7, 1-6
W#1 Female SinglesBrittany Guidetti vs Cameron Passmore6-3, 6-1
2023-06-29vs KC-RH REDWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesK Autumn Hartley vs Jessica Cleary6-1, 6-2
2023-06-27vs LTA-P PURPLEWon 21
W#1 Female DoublesKatherine Lazenby / Erica Moser vs Olimpia Mejia / Halonah Paiss6-4, 6-0
L#1 Female SinglesBrittany Guidetti vs Allyson Horvath1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 Female SinglesK Autumn Hartley vs Britt Allen6-4, 7-5
2023-06-20vs NJ YELLOWWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesKatherine Lazenby / Alexandra Pash vs Caitlin Bock / Jene Pledger6-3, 6-1
W#1 Female SinglesK Autumn Hartley vs Mary Virginia Simpson6-4, 6-0
W#2 Female SinglesBrittany Guidetti vs Megan Shibao6-1, 6-1
2023-06-13vs NJ GREENLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesErica Moser / Alivia Lebeau vs Natalia Isabel Camera Perez / Joy Herrin1-6, 0-6
L#1 Female SinglesBrittany Guidetti vs Mary Brennan6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-06vs BP REDSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesErica Moser / Katherine Lazenby vs Victoria Williams / Macy Bauerle4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 Female SinglesK Autumn Hartley vs Alexandra Wingert6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Katherine Lazenby
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
4.16
Brittany Guidetti
usually #1 Female Singles 60%, also #2 Female Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.02
K Autumn Hartley
usually #1 Female Singles 80%, also #2 Female Singles 20% · published 4.5
3.97
Erica Moser
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Renee French
published
3.56
Casey Rhine
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erica Moser + Katherine Lazenby3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katherine Lazenby
80W–21L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%5%95%
4.23
4.5
Brittany Guidetti
60W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
K Autumn Hartley
77W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Erica Moser
33W–27L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.97
Renee French
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Casey Rhine
31W–80L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.