Teams

HCC WHITE

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-26vs CROWN WHITELost 03
L#1 DoublesHeidi Jobson / Erica Studness vs Brittany Biebl / Susan Cheney4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKim Anderson / Polly Hastie vs Laurie Feler / Nancy Zeigel4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJen Jewett / Carrie Benway vs Paula Ponto / Sarah Shook6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-26vs CROWN WHITELost 12
L#1 DoublesErica Studness / Polly Hastie vs Sarah Shook / Brittany Biebl4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJenifer Burger / Heidi Jobson vs Laurie Feler / Susan Cheney6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarrie Benway / Joan Sego vs Paula Ponto / Nancy Zeigel6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-28vs CROWN WHITELost 03
L#1 DoublesTanya Brennan / Polly Hastie vs Brittany Biebl / Sarah Shook1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHeidi Jobson / Kim Anderson vs Susan Cheney / Janet Leverson0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCarrie Benway / Jen Jewett vs Erica Cicero / Sally Grange2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-28vs CROWN WHITELost 13
L#1 DoublesKim Anderson / Tanya Brennan vs Susan Cheney / Sarah Shook4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesHeidi Jobson vs Brittany Biebl2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPolly Hastie / Jen Jewett vs Laurie Feler / Janet Leverson2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCarrie Benway / Jenifer Burger vs Erica Cicero / Sally Grange6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CROWN WHITE4011922189
2HCC WHITE0421837231

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jen Jewett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Carrie Benway
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Erica Studness
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Heidi Jobson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Jenifer Burger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Joan Sego
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Polly Hastie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tanya Brennan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Benway + Jen Jewett1452% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jen Jewett
63W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Carrie Benway
13W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
Erica Studness
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Heidi Jobson
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenifer Burger
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joan Sego
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Polly Hastie
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tanya Brennan
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.