Teams

CROWN WHITE

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

8 players · average NTRP 4.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-26vs HCC WHITEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Shook / Brittany Biebl vs Erica Studness / Polly Hastie6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaurie Feler / Susan Cheney vs Jenifer Burger / Heidi Jobson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaula Ponto / Nancy Zeigel vs Carrie Benway / Joan Sego7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2025-07-26vs HCC WHITEWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrittany Biebl / Susan Cheney vs Heidi Jobson / Erica Studness6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaurie Feler / Nancy Zeigel vs Kim Anderson / Polly Hastie6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPaula Ponto / Sarah Shook vs Jen Jewett / Carrie Benway7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-28vs HCC WHITEWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrittany Biebl / Sarah Shook vs Tanya Brennan / Polly Hastie6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Cheney / Janet Leverson vs Heidi Jobson / Kim Anderson6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesErica Cicero / Sally Grange vs Carrie Benway / Jen Jewett6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-28vs HCC WHITEWon 31
W#1 DoublesSusan Cheney / Sarah Shook vs Kim Anderson / Tanya Brennan6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesBrittany Biebl vs Heidi Jobson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaurie Feler / Janet Leverson vs Polly Hastie / Jen Jewett6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesErica Cicero / Sally Grange vs Carrie Benway / Jenifer Burger4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CROWN WHITE4011922189
2HCC WHITE0421837231

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Sarah Shook
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.26
Laurie Feler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Brittany Biebl
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.07
Janet Leverson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.68
Nancy Zeigel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Paula Ponto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Erica Cicero
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sally Grange
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Zeigel + Paula Ponto2450% gamesnot enough data
Janet Leverson + Nancy Zeigel134 matchesnot enough data
Sally Grange + Paula Ponto033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sarah Shook
35W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Laurie Feler
42W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Brittany Biebl
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Janet Leverson
26W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
4
Nancy Zeigel
63W–59L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
4
Paula Ponto
37W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Erica Cicero
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally Grange
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.