Teams

Marion/Chouinard

2026 Marion Adult 65 & Over Winter · 7.0 W Tue

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-17vs SV Aces-PrittWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoan Blanding / Nadine Zastrow vs Irma Buttermore / Lynne Finman6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPatricia James / Linda Jones vs Briget Brothers / Rita Meek6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJill Eng / Wanda Simpson vs Susan Barry / Carmen Rosengarten6-2, 6-3
2026-03-10vs Glenview PerkinsWon 21
L#1 DoublesRobin Zink / Wanda Simpson vs Maria AnneDiOrio / Vicki Collins1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia James / Linda Jones vs Joanne Collier / Maricel Keiter6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiane Stablein / Mary Meek vs Robin Lancaster / Nancy Radzimski6-0, 7-5
2026-02-24vs SV Aces-PrittWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoan Blanding / Nadine Zastrow vs Lynne Finman / Susan Barry6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRobin Zink / Mary Jeanne Walsh vs Carmen Rosengarten / Tana Hubbard7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2026-02-20vs Glenview PerkinsWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Meek / Diane Stablein vs Catherine Sersen / Diane Cassidy2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJudy Hoops / Ann-Marie Chouinard vs Maria AnneDiOrio / Joanne Collier6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Jeanne Walsh / Lisa Lee vs Sally Perkins / Maricel Keiter6-1, 6-1
2026-02-04vs SV Aces-PrittWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoan Blanding / Nadine Zastrow vs Lynne Finman / Briget Brothers6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJudy Hoops / Ann-Marie Chouinard vs Rita Meek / Tana Hubbard7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJill Eng / Shelley Alfieri vs Linda Johnson / Henny David6-1, 6-1
2026-01-30vs Glenview PerkinsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoan Blanding / Shelley Alfieri vs Diane Cassidy / Catherine Sersen2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnn-Marie Chouinard / Judy Hoops vs Maria AnneDiOrio / Sally Perkins7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Lee / Wanda Simpson vs Joanne Collier / Vicki Collins7-6, 6-4
2026-01-20vs Glenview PerkinsWon 30
W#1 DoublesWanda Simpson / Lisa Lee vs Maricel Keiter / Maria AnneDiOrio6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJill Eng / Nadine Zastrow vs Catherine Sersen / Diane Cassidy6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJudy Hoops / Shelley Alfieri vs Sally Perkins / Laura Flanagan7-6, 6-4
2026-01-13vs SV Aces-PrittWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudy Hoops / Ann-Marie Chouinard vs Rita Meek / Henny David6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJill Eng / Shelley Alfieri vs Briget Brothers / Irma Buttermore2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Stablein / Mary Meek vs Susan Barry / Tana Hubbard6-0, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Tue have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Diane Stablein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Linda Jones
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.41
Judy Hoops
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.34
Mary Jeanne Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Ann-Marie Chouinard
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.22
Lisa Lee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Jill Eng
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Shelley Alfieri
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Robin Zink
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.97
Mary Meek
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Patricia James
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.93
Melanie Turner
published
Joan Blanding
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nadine Zastrow
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Wanda Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Hoops + Ann-Marie Chouinard8554% games−4.2% vs expected
Lisa Lee + Mary Jeanne Walsh314 matchesnot enough data
Nadine Zastrow + Joan Blanding303 matchesnot enough data
Mary Meek + Diane Stablein213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Stablein
6W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Linda Jones
24W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Judy Hoops
16W–19L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
Mary Jeanne Walsh
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Ann-Marie Chouinard
10W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Lisa Lee
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Jill Eng
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Shelley Alfieri
137W–98L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Robin Zink
4W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Mary Meek
20W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Patricia James
98W–75L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Melanie Turner
40W–53L career · no lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.93
Joan Blanding
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nadine Zastrow
9W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wanda Simpson
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.