Teams

Glenview Perkins

2026 Marion Adult 65 & Over Winter · 7.0 W Tue

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-24vs SV Aces-PrittWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaryn Dolan / Marcia Plante vs Henny David / Tana Hubbard6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCatherine Sersen / Diane Cassidy vs Briget Brothers / Carmen Rosengarten7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Flanagan / Judy Kobel vs Irma Buttermore / Rita Meek6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-10vs Marion/ChouinardLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaria AnneDiOrio / Vicki Collins vs Robin Zink / Wanda Simpson6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJoanne Collier / Maricel Keiter vs Patricia James / Linda Jones3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Lancaster / Nancy Radzimski vs Diane Stablein / Mary Meek0-6, 5-7
2026-03-04vs SV Aces-PrittWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Cassidy / Catherine Sersen vs Briget Brothers / Lynne Finman6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJudy Kobel / Nancy Radzimski vs Tana Hubbard / Linda Johnson5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKaryn Dolan / Marcia Plante vs Susan Barry / Irma Buttermore6-1, 6-3
2026-02-20vs Marion/ChouinardLost 12
W#1 DoublesCatherine Sersen / Diane Cassidy vs Mary Meek / Diane Stablein6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMaria AnneDiOrio / Joanne Collier vs Judy Hoops / Ann-Marie Chouinard1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSally Perkins / Maricel Keiter vs Mary Jeanne Walsh / Lisa Lee1-6, 1-6
2026-02-10vs SV Aces-PrittWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Sersen / Diane Cassidy vs Henny David / Susan Barry6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMaricel Keiter / Judy Kobel vs Briget Brothers / Lynne Finman4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Flanagan / Nancy Radzimski vs Irma Buttermore / Rita Meek6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-30vs Marion/ChouinardLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiane Cassidy / Catherine Sersen vs Joan Blanding / Shelley Alfieri6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMaria AnneDiOrio / Sally Perkins vs Ann-Marie Chouinard / Judy Hoops5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoanne Collier / Vicki Collins vs Lisa Lee / Wanda Simpson6-7, 4-6
2026-01-21vs SV Aces-PrittWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane Cassidy / Catherine Sersen vs Henny David / Rita Meek7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMaria AnneDiOrio / Nancy Radzimski vs Briget Brothers / Joan Kelsey6-1, 7-5
2026-01-20vs Marion/ChouinardLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaricel Keiter / Maria AnneDiOrio vs Wanda Simpson / Lisa Lee4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Sersen / Diane Cassidy vs Jill Eng / Nadine Zastrow4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSally Perkins / Laura Flanagan vs Judy Hoops / Shelley Alfieri6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Tue have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Karyn Dolan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.38
Diane Cassidy
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.32
Catherine Sersen
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.28
Laura Flanagan
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.04
Maricel Keiter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Joanne Collier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Judy Kobel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Marcia Plante
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Maria AnneDiOrio
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Nancy Radzimski
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Robin Lancaster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sally Perkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Vicki Collins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Sersen + Diane Cassidy8264% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karyn Dolan
6W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Diane Cassidy
13W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Catherine Sersen
8W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Laura Flanagan
30W–59L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Maricel Keiter
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Joanne Collier
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
Judy Kobel
62W–96L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marcia Plante
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maria AnneDiOrio
2W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Radzimski
2W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robin Lancaster
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sally Perkins
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vicki Collins
19W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.