Teams

LJEP-Epler/NMP

2024 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Men 8.5 Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-05vs LSSR-Sree/NMP/8540+Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarl Yerger / Jeremy Cowper vs Neil White / Hao Dang6-4, 6-1
2024-10-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesJames Epler / Baker Arrowood vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-28vs LDWI-Winton/LNRCWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarl Yerger / Jeremy Cowper vs Todd Moyer / Charles Hayes6-1, 7-5
2024-09-25vs LPKU-Kumar/PAC 85_40Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRogers Warner / James Epler vs Yeshpal Lakkadi / Justin Brynn3-6, 1-6
2024-09-07vs LSRE-Reynolds/Peninsula 8.5MWon 10
W#1 DoublesVaughn Schmutz / James Epler vs Vincent Altamura / Alfu Miah3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-08-24vs LLKI-King/HNPLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarl Yerger / Jeremy Cowper vs Lance King / Mario Henry1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Vaughn Schmutz
published
4.07
Jon Koceja
published
4.07
Rogers Warner
published
3.98
Douglas Hausler
published
3.97
Carl Yerger
published 4.5
3.87
Jeremy Cowper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Robert Eric Nielsen
published
3.78
Mark Robson
published
3.74
James Epler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Todd Armstrong
published
3.68
Matthew Fairbairn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Cowper + Mark Robson4172% games+6.4% vs expected
Jeremy Cowper + James Epler4354% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Fairbairn + Robert Eric Nielsen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vaughn Schmutz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
Jon Koceja
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
4.07
Rogers Warner
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.07
Douglas Hausler
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
4.5
Carl Yerger
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Jeremy Cowper
115W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.87
Robert Eric Nielsen
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
Mark Robson
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
James Epler
67W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
Todd Armstrong
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Matthew Fairbairn
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.