Teams

Not My Fault

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over · Women 3.5 - 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-28vs Montana/Ruthruff/40&Over3.5WLost 04
L#1 DoublesSusie Boyer / Amy Berghold vs Elizabeth Suh / Christie Chiang0-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesEmily Ridgway vs Nancy Trangmoe2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAimee Schrank / Faye Nelson vs Julie Birgenheier / Sally Lentz6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Buss / Lauren Cromer vs Terri Nickless / Sandrah MacK4-6, 2-6
2024-07-28vs Montana/Ruthruff/40&Over3.5WLost 13
W#1 DoublesSusie Boyer / Lauren Cromer vs Terri Ruthruff / Cindy Fenick4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRosanna Watson vs Christie Chiang1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Ridgway / Malissa Peace vs Terri Nickless / Sandrah MacK2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMaria King / Diane Buss vs Elizabeth Suh / Nancy Trangmoe0-6, 1-6
2024-07-27vs Love the BattleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesFaye Nelson / Aimee Schrank vs Holly Giles / Sara Polanchek2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Berghold vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDiane Buss / Maria King vs Danielle Sebastian / Juli McLain4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusie Boyer / Lauren Cromer vs Patrisha Crisp / Blair Davison6-1, 7-5
2024-07-27vs Love the BattleWon 30
W#1 DoublesFaye Nelson / Amy Berghold vs Blair Davison / Holly Giles6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEmily Ridgway / Malissa Peace vs Danielle Sebastian / Juli McLain6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria King / Rosanna Watson vs Sara Polanchek / Patrisha Crisp6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 - 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aimee Schrank
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Amy Berghold
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Emily Ridgway
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Faye Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Rosanna Watson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Susie Boyer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Maria King
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Lauren Cromer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Diane Buss
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Malissa Peace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria King + Rosanna Watson3254% games+12.8% vs expected
Faye Nelson + Emily Ridgway3351% games+8.6% vs expected
Susie Boyer + Amy Berghold4452% games+1.4% vs expected
Susie Boyer + Lauren Cromer51638% games−2.3% vs expected
Susie Boyer + Faye Nelson4548% games−2.8% vs expected
Diane Buss + Maria King2538% games−3.7% vs expected
Diane Buss + Lauren Cromer1730% games−7.3% vs expected
Faye Nelson + Rosanna Watson1447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aimee Schrank
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Amy Berghold
27W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Emily Ridgway
10W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Faye Nelson
17W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Rosanna Watson
5W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Susie Boyer
31W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Maria King
17W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Lauren Cromer
7W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Diane Buss
13W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Malissa Peace
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.