Teams

Post-Rust/McGill-DFC

2025 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-13vs EWyngaarden-HRLost 02
L#1 SinglesAdrianne Leinbach vs Mary Feger2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesChrista McGill vs Tiffany Langino1-6, 1-6
2025-07-08vs SFranks-ENOSplit 11
L#1 SinglesChrista McGill vs Amy Hoots3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Laurie Straube6-2, 6-3
2025-07-01vs KFuller-ENOLost 03
L#1 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Nancy Pack0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesChrista McGill vs Meghan Rider4-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Emily Childs6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-10vs MLong-ENOWon 30
W#1 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Kim Peters4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Jane Okulski6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAdrianne Leinbach vs Charmayne Rozenek4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-03vs SFranks-ENOSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Cathy Joyce2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Amy Hoots6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-05-27vs KFuller-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Nancy Pack2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Meghan Rider3-6, 2-6
2025-05-20vs EWyngaarden-HRLost 12
L#1 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Mary Feger3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Carrie Couto6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Julie Spearman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-06vs MLong-ENOSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAdrianne Leinbach vs Kim Peters6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Lekisha Felix6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Dayna Kelly
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.71
Amanda Lacoff
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.65
Adrianne Leinbach
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.62
Christa McGill
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.61
Susie Post-Rust
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.59
Nhon Nicole Cobb
published
3.36
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Susan Easterling + Amanda Lacoff5165% games+11.8% vs expected
Dayna Kelly + Christa McGill8358% games+3.9% vs expected
Dayna Kelly + Adrianne Leinbach5255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dayna Kelly
126W–99L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Amanda Lacoff
191W–114L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Adrianne Leinbach
239W–225L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Christa McGill
119W–124L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Susie Post-Rust
81W–94L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
Nhon Nicole Cobb
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
Mary Susan Easterling
25W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.