Teams

CP YELLOW

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-13vs GTC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesLena Ursten Hobbs / Emily Redfield vs Jill Wichlens / Janet Willson6-1, 6-2
2024-06-06vs DTC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeborah Clark / Lena Ursten Hobbs vs Dana Pianowski / Pamela Marsh6-4, 6-3
2024-05-30vs CACM GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeborah Clark / Lena Ursten Hobbs vs Jimmie Whorton / Suzanne Killmer6-0, 6-0
2024-05-23vs PTC NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobyn Frahm / Rebecca Burckhardt vs Sheila Salyers / Caren Swan2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-16vs VC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Redfield / Robyn Frahm vs Kathleen Nisbet / Nancy Fridstein6-2, 6-4
2024-05-09vs GTC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesLena Ursten Hobbs / Deborah Clark vs Kim Collins / Karen Schuster6-2, 6-4
2024-05-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesLena Ursten Hobbs / Robyn Frahm vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Lena Ursten Hobbs
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Deborah Howard
published 3
2.81
Amy Crockett
published 3
Cyndie Miller
published 3
2.70
Robyn Frahm
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Erin Mann
published
Julie Schindler
published
Rebecca Burckhardt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Mann + Amy Crockett4352% games−4.4% vs expected
Robyn Frahm + Lena Ursten Hobbs4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lena Ursten Hobbs
179W–121L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
3
Deborah Howard
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Amy Crockett
13W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Cyndie Miller
21W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Robyn Frahm
83W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
Erin Mann
21W–17L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Julie Schindler
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Burckhardt
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.