Teams

VC BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-13vs DTC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesJanney Carpenter / Stephanie McCoy vs Cherlyn Linden / Dana Pianowski3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnnie Cordova / Joanie Mankus vs Kimberly Nanke / Sarah Sexton6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-06vs PTC NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnnie Cordova / Stephanie McCoy vs Debbie Lepetsos / Caren Swan1-6, 4-6
2024-05-30vs GTC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanney Carpenter / Annie Cordova vs Ginny Crise / Tamara Whelpley6-4, 6-2
2024-05-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnnie Cordova / Kathy Hoskins vs Cheryl Caldwell / Carol Sullivan6-0, 6-1
2024-05-16vs CP YELLOWLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanney Carpenter / Trisha Barney vs Deborah Clark / Julie Schindler4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-05-09vs DTC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesAnnie Cordova / Stephanie McCoy vs Sheri Jacobs / Cherlyn Linden3-6, 1-6
2024-05-02vs PTC NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnnie Cordova / Kathy Hoskins vs Debbie Lepetsos / Diane Liberty5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Kathy Hoskins
published
2.79
Stephanie McCoy
published
2.75
Janney Carpenter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Annie Cordova
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.28
Nancy Fridstein
published
2.18
Kathleen Nisbet
published
Joanie Mankus
published
Trisha Barney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janney Carpenter + Annie Cordova3247% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Nisbet + Joanie Mankus033 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Nisbet + Nancy Fridstein033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Hoskins
17W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
2.83
Stephanie McCoy
20W–22L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Janney Carpenter
14W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Annie Cordova
40W–59L career · 6 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69
Nancy Fridstein
16W–26L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.28
Kathleen Nisbet
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.18
Joanie Mankus
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Trisha Barney
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.