Teams

SGV Flint- Oriiz Reyes-Flint Canyon/SA12

2022 Mixed Tri Level -18 &Over-San Gabriel Valley · SGV - 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.61 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesMiguel Ortiz-Reyes / Antoinette Lessuk vs Sander Zandbergen / Jane Wang1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Mandel / David Mandel vs Chelsea Li / Zhan Yan0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Mandel / David Mandel vs Ryan Ona / Grace Eleyae2-6, 2-6
2022-10-15vs SGV Skyline- B.Chan-WN/SA10Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDave Sparks / Kristin McQueen vs Brian Chan / Xiaochun Wang6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAntoinette Lessuk / David Nichols vs Jimmy Chang / Jasmine M Liu0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Mandel / David Mandel vs Robert Estrada / Kay Taylor0-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesKristin McQueen / Dave Sparks vs Ted Nuguid / Ennie Gonzaga7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Dave Sparks
published 4
3.81
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
published
3.81
3.78
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
published
3.77
Penapa Frick
published
3.70
Esther Hwang
published 4
3.49
Kristin McQueen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.35
Thomas Hegelund
published
3.26
Antoinette Lessuk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Helle Hegelund
published 3.5
3.18
Sandy Mandel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Pamela Girard
published
2.90
Katherine Loevinger
published
2.84
David Loevinger
published 3
David Mandel
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin McQueen + Dave Sparks1841% games+0.7% vs expected
Helle Hegelund + Thomas Hegelund1936% games−25.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dave Sparks
26W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
29W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Ferdinand Fontanilla
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
22W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
Penapa Frick
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Esther Hwang
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Kristin McQueen
208W–189L career · 2 lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.49
Thomas Hegelund
5W–18L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Antoinette Lessuk
164W–156L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Helle Hegelund
8W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Sandy Mandel
70W–85L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Pamela Girard
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Katherine Loevinger
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
David Loevinger
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
David Mandel
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.