← Search

Thomas Hegelund

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Los Angeles, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 41W–66L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history107 matches
L
2026-09-27 · SGV Nordic Thistles-Goran-Flint Cyn/SU2 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ralph Ringgold
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-16 · SGV Flint Mix- Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SA 4 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helle Hegelund mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-16 · SGV Nordic Thistles-Goran-Flint Cyn/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Goran
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-09 · SGV Nordic Thistles-Goran-Flint Cyn/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Goran
loading the estimate
7-6, 0-0
L
2026-06-27 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Antoinette Lessuk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-13 · SGV Flint Fighters- Ortiz Reyes-Flint Canyon/SU4 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Miller
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-17 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helle Hegelund mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-03 · SGV Flint Fighters- Ortiz Reyes-Flint Canyon/SU4 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Tatoulian
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-04-26 · SGV Flint Fighters- Ortiz Reyes-Flint Canyon/SU4 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sam Bruchey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-18 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helle Hegelund mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-12 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helle Hegelund mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-29 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helle Hegelund mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
48.8%
20W–21L · 50.6% of games
4.0
25%
4W–12L · 39.7% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 32.9% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
0%
0W–6L · 26.6% of games
7.0mixed
34.4%
11W–21L · 42.2% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe