← Search

Michael Goran

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Los Angeles, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 36W–54L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history90 matches
W
2026-10-17 · SGV Nordic Thistles-Goran-Flint Cyn/SU2 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Mahrer
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-27 · SGV Nordic Thistles-Goran-Flint Cyn/SU2 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Berman
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-16 · SGV Flint Mix- Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SA 4 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryann Brandon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · SGV Nordic Thistles-Goran-Flint Cyn/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Hegelund
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-09 · SGV Nordic Thistles-Goran-Flint Cyn/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Hegelund
loading the estimate
7-6, 0-0
W
2026-06-27 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryann Brandon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-31 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Feiming Morgan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Feiming Morgan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-12 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Antoinette Lessuk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-01 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryann Brandon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-01-24 · SGV Flintstones-Hegelund-flint Cyn/SU2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryann Brandon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-26 · SGV Nordic Thistles-Goran-Flint Cyn/SA2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Hegelund
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
44.9%
22W–27L · 47.7% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 31.1% of games
7.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 46.7% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 41.5% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 51% of the time
#3 Doubles
51%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert