Teams

RRTC GREEN

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-05vs PCC NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarla Roper / Heather McGinnis vs Cait Dutcher / Julie Zaveral6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesChrysie Ready vs Karen Armetta6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-08-29vs SS-LT ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesMarla Roper / Andrea Karp vs Kristen Arsenault / Melinda Conover5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-08-22vs PRC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichelle Aikin / Heather McGinnis vs Sabrina Alvarez / Courtney Mendell7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKimberly Parks / Chrysie Ready vs Lisa Wiggins / Keenan Young7-5, 7-6
2024-08-15vs PCRK BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Kelly / Marla Roper vs Debra Kuebler / Gina Roth6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHeather McGinnis / Vida Melvin vs Cathy Shahan / Stacy Cieraszynski3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-08-08vs CCV GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle Aikin / Heather McGinnis vs Jill Filene / Lindsey Talaga5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesVida Melvin / Chrysie Ready vs Marne Melun / Laura L Marturano6-2, 6-4
2024-08-01vs PRC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarla Roper / Michelle Aikin vs Leslie Hathaway / Wendy Mathewson7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesChrysie Ready vs Kelly Glenn3-6, 4-6
2024-07-25vs HRCA-S YELLOWLost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Parks / Chrysie Ready vs Kimberly Bevill / Leann Penland7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Andrea Karp
published 3.5
3.30
Marla Roper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Chrysie Ready
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Heather McGinnis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Patricia Nowlan
published
Michelle Aikin
published
Vida Melvin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather McGinnis + Marla Roper6255% games+2.7% vs expected
Vida Melvin + Patricia Nowlan1537% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Karp
32W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.58
3.5
Marla Roper
148W–90L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Chrysie Ready
172W–139L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Heather McGinnis
80W–85L career · 4 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
Patricia Nowlan
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.88
Michelle Aikin
26W–34L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vida Melvin
3W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.