Teams

HRCA-S YELLOW

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.60 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-05vs SS-LT ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesStacy Garmon / Elise Marks-Gruitch vs Kristen Arsenault / Melinda Conover1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Bevill / Oxana Volodko vs Jennifer Benson / Debra St John6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2024-09-03vs PRC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesStacy Garmon / Oxana Volodko vs Leslie Hathaway / Julie Hernandez6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Dudek / Kimberly Bevill vs Henriette Nash / Carrie del Toro7-6, 6-3
2024-08-29vs PCRK BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesOxana Volodko / Kimberly Bevill vs Gina Roth / Debra Kuebler6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-08-15vs PCC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathy Dudek / Oxana Volodko vs Cait Dutcher / Meagan Minshall6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKimberly Bevill / Leann Penland vs Kelly Bromeier / Janice Greene5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-08-01vs CCV GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStacey Miller / Elise Marks-Gruitch vs Melissa Rogers / Laura L Marturano3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKimberly Bevill / Nantida Hong vs Jill Filene / Marne Melun6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-25vs RRTC GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Bevill / Leann Penland vs Kimberly Parks / Chrysie Ready5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-24vs PRC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Bevill / Stacy Garmon vs Norine Nelson Martin / Gina Lurie3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Nantida Hong
published 4
3.37
Elise Marks-Gruitch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Oxana Volodko
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Stacy Garmon
published
3.10
Kathy Dudek
published
3.03
Leann Penland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Kimberly Bevill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Bevill + Leann Penland5549% games+4.2% vs expected
Kimberly Bevill + Nantida Hong251057% games−0.3% vs expected
Kimberly Bevill + Oxana Volodko4743% games−2.2% vs expected
Kimberly Bevill + Elise Marks-Gruitch2349% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Dudek + Nantida Hong404 matchesnot enough data
Oxana Volodko + Leann Penland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nantida Hong
115W–73L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Elise Marks-Gruitch
98W–59L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Oxana Volodko
38W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Stacy Garmon
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Kathy Dudek
19W–24L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Leann Penland
37W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Kimberly Bevill
95W–107L career · type A · 7 lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.