Teams

TN/Knoxville/Nelson

2023 Combo 40 & Over- Knoxville · 7.5 40 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-15vs Fuller/ KnoxvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesCorrena Dickson / Emily Elison vs Ida Randall / Ellen Flautt3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-08vs Gardner/BowersWon 10
W#2 DoublesNicole White / Emily Elison vs Lori Brown / Terri Bowers6-0, 6-4
2023-10-01vs Perkey/DavisWon 10
W#3 DoublesCorrena Dickson / Emily Elison vs Pamela Shirley / Sharon Clark6-0, 6-2
2023-09-21vs Gardner/BowersWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeigh Gleason / Emily Elison vs Kimberly Woody / Monica Casey6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2023-09-10vs Perkey/DavisWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristi Leach / Emily Elison vs Pamela Shirley / Sharon Clark5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
A Marie Kennedy
published 4
3.59
Tammy Simpson
published
3.58
Correna Dickson
published 4
3.58
Leigh Gleason
published
3.56
Emily Elison
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Lea Ann Fields
published
3.45
Jeanne Blake
published
3.43
Kristi Leach
published
3.27
Suzanne Mubarak
published
3.10
2.99
Stacey Wright
published
Michelle Wakefield
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

A Marie Kennedy + Tammy Simpson4160% games+6.1% vs expected
Jeanne Blake + Suzanne Mubarak5169% games+4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
A Marie Kennedy
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Tammy Simpson
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.59
4
Correna Dickson
14W–18L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
Leigh Gleason
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Emily Elison
136W–77L career · 9 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Lea Ann Fields
8W–20L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
Jeanne Blake
14W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
Kristi Leach
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.43
Suzanne Mubarak
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Debbie Della-Rodolfa
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Stacey Wright
6W–23L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99
Michelle Wakefield
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.