Teams

WASHINGTON PK 40AW3.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-01-25vs OAKLAND HILLS 40AW3.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Sumrall / Grace Man vs Lauren Addicott / Janelle Jones6-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Marie Huxley
published
3.43
Ada Palotai
published 3.5
3.27
Christine Kizziah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Mary Anderson
published
3.23
Sarah McElhinney
published
3.20
Anna DeRoos
published 3.5
3.18
Jessica Pfannenstiel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Nicole Nguyen
published
2.91
Jann King
published
2.87
Danoh Nibler
published 3
2.85
Mel Chang
published
2.85
2.83
Serena Zanello
published
2.71
Audrey Irwin
published 3
2.71
Lynne Harrington
published
2.67
Cora Luber
published 3
2.62
Laura Sumrall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Soroya Wood
published
Tyler Martz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ada Palotai + Christine Kizziah4261% games+6.1% vs expected
Catharina Koh-Mollet + Christine Kizziah044 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Nguyen + Catharina Koh-Mollet303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marie Huxley
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Ada Palotai
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Christine Kizziah
10W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Mary Anderson
25W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.25
Sarah McElhinney
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Anna DeRoos
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Jessica Pfannenstiel
19W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.18
Nicole Nguyen
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
Jann King
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Danoh Nibler
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
Mel Chang
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Catharina Koh-Mollet
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
Serena Zanello
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Audrey Irwin
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
Lynne Harrington
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Cora Luber
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
Laura Sumrall
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
Soroya Wood
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.43
Tyler Martz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.