Teams

MCSP.Vyas

2024 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-17vs TOC.VergheseLost 02
L#1 DoublesTevin Wilson / Joshua Ganeles vs Manikandan Subramanian / Ramana Sodem3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDipen Vyas / Josh Jones vs Sathisha Kumar / Pankaj Nawal3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-10vs TOC.YadavLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoshua Ganeles / Dipen Vyas vs Michael Trebuhov / Jonathan Canon2-6, 0-6
2024-06-26vs TING.ByrdLost 01
L#1 DoublesTevin Wilson / Joshua Ganeles vs Guillermo Velarde / Beomjun Ju2-6, 2-6
2024-06-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlejandro Fernandez / Dipen Vyas vs Cameron Crump / Michael McGuire3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-06-19vs TOC.GregsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesDipen Vyas / Joshua Ganeles vs William Clark / Ryan Sayko1-6, 1-6
2024-06-12vs TOC.TurnerLost 01
L#1 DoublesTevin Wilson / Josh Jones vs Craig Cardella / Mark Townley1-6, 6-7
2024-05-29vs MD.CrumplerLost 02
L#1 DoublesTevin Wilson / Joshua Ganeles vs Vance Jennings / Jerfi Cicin6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJosh Jones / Dipen Vyas vs Thomas Ainsley / James Moriarty4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Alejandro Fernandez
published 4.5
3.94
Tevin Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Joshua Ganeles
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.81
Josh Jones
published
3.61
Jitesh Chawla
published
3.46
Dipen Vyas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.26
Ethan Holston
published
Dan Kane
published 3.5
3.23
Jeff Franklin
published
3.16
Richard Millard
published
Siming Mu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Ganeles + Tevin Wilson033 matchesnot enough data
Joshua Ganeles + Dipen Vyas033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alejandro Fernandez
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.04
4
Tevin Wilson
130W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Joshua Ganeles
65W–123L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Josh Jones
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
Jitesh Chawla
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Dipen Vyas
42W–140L career · 5 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.46
Ethan Holston
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Dan Kane
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeff Franklin
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%0%
3.23
Richard Millard
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Siming Mu
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.