Teams

TING.Byrd

2024 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.19 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-27vs TING.MackWon 20
W#2 DoublesNick Gilder / Chris Culver vs Byron Byars / Seth Layton6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGavin Mazurak / Eduardo Schlotterhausen vs Martin Cho / Alex Piasecki6-3, 6-3
2024-06-26vs MCSP.VyasWon 20
W#2 DoublesAubry Carmody / Nick Gilder vs Josh Jones / Jitesh Chawla6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEduardo Schlotterhausen / Gavin Mazurak vs Richard Millard / Ethan Holston6-1, 6-3
2024-06-12vs TOC.TurnerWon 10
W#2 DoublesNick Gilder / Nicholas Lau vs William Adams / Srinath Ekkad6-0, 7-6
2024-06-05vs MD.CrumplerWon 10
W#2 DoublesNick Gilder / Youngjun Lee vs Jim Riddick / John Park6-4, 6-1
2024-05-29vs TOC.VergheseWon 10
W#3 DoublesEduardo Schlotterhausen / Gavin Mazurak vs Seshagiri Kalluru / Pankaj Nawal6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Guillermo Velarde
published 4.5
4.23
Visakan Jayakumar
published
4.13
Beomjun Ju
published 4.5
4.06
Jermaine Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.04
Youngjun Lee
published
4.02
Aubry Carmody
published 4
3.88
Nick Gilder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Chris Culver
published 4
3.84
Ryan Kessler
published
3.69
Gavin Mazurak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Nicholas Lau
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Guillermo Velarde
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
4.26
Visakan Jayakumar
28W–17L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Beomjun Ju
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
136W–127L career · 5 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
Youngjun Lee
45W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
4.04
4
Aubry Carmody
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
4.02
4
Nick Gilder
111W–89L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Chris Culver
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.87
Ryan Kessler
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Gavin Mazurak
119W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Eduardo Schlotterhausen
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.65
Nicholas Lau
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.