Teams

TING.Mack

2024 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.22 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-17vs TOC.GregsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesSergii Porokh / Cameron Crump vs Maxwell Gregson / Brady Sowers2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-10vs MD.CrumplerWon 10
W#2 DoublesSergii Porokh / Byron Byars vs Thomas Ainsley / Andrew Winzenz7-5, 6-4
2024-06-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Albright / Michael McGuire vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-25vs MCSP.VyasWon 10
W#1 DoublesCameron Crump / Michael McGuire vs Alejandro Fernandez / Dipen Vyas6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-06-12vs TOC.TurnerWon 10
W#1 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Beomjun Ju vs Craig Cardella / Cecil Turner6-1, 6-3
2024-05-29vs TOC.VergheseWon 10
W#1 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Beomjun Ju vs Deepak Jayashankaran / Chandan Kumar7-6, 6-1
2024-05-29vs TOC.TurnerWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael McGuire / Gaurav Luther vs Mark Townley / Cecil Turner4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Gaurav Luther
published 4.5
4.09
Cameron Crump
published 4.5
4.06
Jermaine Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.06
Michael McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
Seth Layton
published
3.86
Sergii Porokh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
David Nenon
published 4
3.67
Christopher MacK
published 4
3.66
Alex Piasecki
published 4
3.44
Byron Byars
published 4
Jeff Choi
published
Martin Cho
published
XINGZHOU LI
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gaurav Luther
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Cameron Crump
11W–20L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
136W–127L career · 5 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
4.5
Michael McGuire
42W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
Seth Layton
11W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Sergii Porokh
108W–115L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
David Nenon
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Christopher MacK
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Alex Piasecki
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Byron Byars
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.44
Jeff Choi
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Martin Cho
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
XINGZHOU LI
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.