Teams

Hirai

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - TWIN FALLS · Women 3.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-06vs BarnumLost 04
L#1 DoublesNicole Rowley / Jennifer Vargo vs Jamie LaMure / Jena Clayville4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKirstin Wert vs Melissa Lewis1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Roe / Kammi Stoker vs Molly Arrossa / Susan Whitney2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Daily / Evelyn Perez vs Shana Hoge / Judy Graf2-6, 1-6
2023-06-29vs BarnumLost 13
L#1 DoublesChristy Hodges / Connie Maughan vs Jamie LaMure / Susan Whitney6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Vargo vs Kathy Rex6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJamie King / Evelyn Perez vs Molly Arrossa / Melissa Lewis4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKammi Stoker / Kirstin Wert vs Judy Graf / Annette Barnum1-6, 1-6
2023-06-27vs BarnumLost 13
L#1 DoublesNicole Rowley / Jennifer Vargo vs Jamie LaMure / Kelcie Dickerson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChristy Hodges vs Jena Clayville6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJamie King / Evelyn Perez vs Molly Arrossa / Annette Barnum1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Daily / Kirstin Wert vs Kari Brose / Melissa Lewis4-6, 1-6
2023-06-22vs BarnumLost 14
L#1 DoublesJanet Roe / Amy Madrid vs Jamie LaMure / Annette Barnum0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKirstin Wert vs Shana Hoge1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Rowley / Christy Hodges vs Cathy Cooper / Susan Whitney1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesConnie Maughan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Barry / Jamie King vs Molly Arrossa / Judy Graf4-6, 1-6
2023-06-20vs BarnumLost 23
L#1 DoublesConnie Maughan / Janet Roe vs Cathy Cooper / Jena Clayville6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Madrid vs Kathy Rex7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEvelyn Perez / Jennifer Vargo vs Judy Graf / Kelcie Dickerson3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesChristy Hodges vs Shana Hoge7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKirstin Wert / Catherine Daily vs Elizabeth Lassen / Kari Brose1-6, 5-7
2023-06-15vs BarnumLost 05
L#1 DoublesSusan Barry / Connie Maughan vs Jamie LaMure / Judy Graf4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Madrid vs Shana Hoge4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJamie King / Janet Roe vs Cathy Cooper / Susan Whitney1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKammi Stoker vs Elizabeth Lassen1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristy Hodges / Catherine Daily vs Kari Brose / Annette Barnum3-6, 4-6
2023-06-13vs BarnumLost 14
L#1 DoublesJamie King / Evelyn Perez vs Cathy Cooper / Judy Graf2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Vargo vs Jena Clayville4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesConnie Maughan / Kammi Stoker vs Jamie LaMure / Susan Whitney1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesNicole Rowley vs Annette Barnum3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Daily / Janet Roe vs Shana Hoge / Kari Brose7-5, 6-3
2023-06-08vs BarnumLost 14
L#1 DoublesChristy Hodges / Nicole Rowley vs Jamie LaMure / Judy Graf1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesEvelyn Perez vs Jena Clayville0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Maughan / Susan Barry vs Cathy Cooper / Annette Barnum1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCatherine Daily vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Madrid / Jamie King vs Shana Hoge / Elizabeth Lassen6-7, 2-6
2023-06-06vs BarnumLost 23
W#1 DoublesConnie Maughan / Susan Barry vs Cathy Cooper / Susan Whitney6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesEvelyn Perez vs Jena Clayville0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChristy Hodges / Nicole Rowley vs Judy Graf / Annette Barnum5-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAmy Madrid vs Kathy Rex4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJennifer Vargo / Kirstin Wert vs Shana Hoge / Elizabeth Lassen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Barnum90351025299
2Hirai0993673487

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Jennifer Vargo
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Christy Hodges
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Susan Barry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Nicole Rowley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Janet Roe
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.01
Jamie King
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Evelyn Perez
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.86
Connie Maughan
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Amy Madrid
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.48
Catherine Daily
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
Kammi Stoker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Kirstin Wert
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Rowley + Jennifer Vargo3353% games+8.1% vs expected
Connie Maughan + Janet Roe2447% games+4.6% vs expected
Connie Maughan + Susan Barry2347% games−3.0% vs expected
Connie Maughan + Nicole Rowley033 matchesnot enough data
Connie Maughan + Catherine Daily213 matchesnot enough data
Susan Barry + Catherine Daily033 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Rowley + Christy Hodges033 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Rowley + Jamie King213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Vargo
32W–43L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Christy Hodges
3W–7L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Susan Barry
11W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Nicole Rowley
17W–31L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
3
Janet Roe
27W–21L career · type S · 5 lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.10
Jamie King
24W–23L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.01
Evelyn Perez
3W–14L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Connie Maughan
53W–75L career · type A · 7 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Amy Madrid
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Catherine Daily
13W–59L career · 6 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.48
Kammi Stoker
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kirstin Wert
2W–9L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.