Teams

LKPO-Powell/Westport 18s

2022 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-09vs LSBeardslee/WestportLost 12
W#1 DoublesAstrid Peterson / Ann Murphy vs Sandra Stinson / Meagan Palmer6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSheila Chast vs Brenda Clay1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMali Robinson vs Kathleen Stiffler1-6, 3-6
2022-05-02vs LSMcCue-Takes/EdgemoorLost 13
L#1 DoublesMali Robinson / Astrid Peterson vs Shelly McCue / Louisa Dow3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMarilou Martin / Ann Murphy vs Amy Dunn / Brenda Kadlecik6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSheila Chast vs Kristin Wilson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeth Franck / Pam Barbagli vs Amy East / Angela Marchant0-6, 1-6
2022-04-14vs LCAburrow/NorthstoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesBridgett Dedmond / Marilou Martin vs Tia Allocco / Katie Huffstetler7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAstrid Peterson / Mali Robinson vs Sherry Carpenter / Alison Pangilinan6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPam Barbagli / Sheila Chast vs Karen Adams / Suzy Wright6-3, 6-0
2022-04-04vs LKPippin/JettonLost 12
W#1 DoublesAstrid Peterson / Marilou Martin vs Sylvia Sullivan / Samantha Schneider6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDana Andrews / Beth Franck vs Leslie Shaw / Martine Maness6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSheila Chast vs Kelli Rester6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-03-28vs LSBeardslee/WestportSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMarilou Martin / Angela Childers vs Candace Newman / Heather Bain3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSherilyn Dlugolenski / Astrid Peterson vs Meagan Palmer / Sandra Stinson6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesSheila Chast vs Brenda Clay0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Wulfhorst / Mali Robinson vs Hayley Steedley / Colleen Burnham6-4, 7-5
2022-03-26vs LPSaine/LNTCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBridgett Dedmond / Sheila Chast vs Patricia Bochey / Pamela Saine6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSherilyn Dlugolenski / Astrid Peterson vs Karen Bigelow / Amy English6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMali Robinson vs Cori Peters4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPam Barbagli / Beth Franck vs Karen Smith / Jennifer Denzler3-6, 4-6
2022-03-21vs LTBotkins/CaldwellPkLost 13
L#1 DoublesAnn Murphy / Marilou Martin vs Lisa Bograd / Aimee Reimann2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSherilyn Dlugolenski / Astrid Peterson vs Kristin Carvelli / Jean Resener6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesMali Robinson vs Nicole Francomano6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPam Barbagli / Beth Franck vs Tiffany Botkins / Pam Britt4-6, 4-6
2022-03-19vs LSMcCue-Takes/EdgemoorLost 12
L#2 DoublesCatherine Wulfhorst / Sherilyn Dlugolenski vs Angela Marchant / Louisa Dow2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSheila Chast vs Katherine Karnatz6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnn Murphy / Marilou Martin vs Sheila Pensler / Margaret Rettinger7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Marilou Martin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.50
Bridgett Dedmond
published 3.5
3.38
Ann Murphy
published 3.5
3.23
Mali Robinson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.22
Astrid Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.07
Angela Childers
published 3.5
2.82
Sherilyn Dlugolenski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Sheila Chast
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.69
Dana Andrews
published 3
2.36
Beth Franck
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.25
Catherine Wulfhorst
published 2.5
2.15
Kerri Powell
published 2.5
Pam Barbagli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Astrid Peterson + Mali Robinson203445% games−0.4% vs expected
Astrid Peterson + Bridgett Dedmond2347% gamesnot enough data
Astrid Peterson + Sherilyn Dlugolenski314 matchesnot enough data
Bridgett Dedmond + Mali Robinson314 matchesnot enough data
Beth Franck + Marilou Martin033 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Chast + Marilou Martin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marilou Martin
111W–89L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Bridgett Dedmond
91W–62L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Ann Murphy
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Mali Robinson
80W–115L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Astrid Peterson
105W–86L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Angela Childers
80W–56L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Sherilyn Dlugolenski
85W–59L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Sheila Chast
117W–139L career · 12 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Dana Andrews
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
2.5
Beth Franck
62W–77L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Catherine Wulfhorst
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Kerri Powell
49W–49L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Pam Barbagli
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.